Quantcast
Channel: Madison - St. Clair Record
Viewing all 22043 articles
Browse latest View live

Madison County civil docket Sept. 21-25

$
0
0

Madison County Civil Docket:




Monday, September 21




9 a.m.




DUFT CONNIE V. RANDLE GREGORY

13-L-001695, CROWDER 320




FUENTES PATRICIA V. ASSET MANAGEMENT SPECIALISTS I

13-L-001943, CROWDER 320




STONE TONYA M V. STUECKEL SCOTT H

11-L-000160, CROWDER 320




LANKFORD JENNIFER L V. THOMPSON MORGAN B

12-L-001640, MUDGE 302




CHESNUT CLEDA V. FAST EDDIES BON AIR

14-L-000403, MUDGE 302




HOLLAND DANA L V. BIXLER KATIE LYNN FKA KATIE LY

12-L-001500, RUTH 311




BAUER THOMAS G V. EDWARDS TARYN N

13-L-001172, RUTH 311




ODOM WILLIAM D V. DADDIE OS NITE OUT INC

14-L-000667, RUTH 311




KORTE ELIZABETH A V. ST PAUL CATHOLIC CHURCH

13-L-002172, MATOESIAN 351







Friday, September 25




9 a.m.




ROBERTS MARTHA V. ALLIS CHALMERS CORP PRODUCTS L

14-L-001669, ASBESTOS J 327




RAZEGHI-JAHROMI MOHAMMAD V. GATEWAY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTE

12-L-001092, CROWDER 320




OSBORNE SARAH E V. BURNSIDE DAVID W MD

15-L-000537, CROWDER 320




FUESTING MARK A V. TEBBE JOYCE

15-L-000766, CROWDER 320




O'BRIEN HUNTER A MINOR BY HIS V. EAST ALTON WOOD RIVER

13-L-001587, CROWDER 320


Woman files Dram Shop suit against three bars following fatal car accident

$
0
0

A St. Clair County woman filed a Dram Shop suit against three bars and the owners after her daughter was killed in a car accident.

Dawn Porter filed a lawsuit on Aug. 20 in St. Clair County Circuit Court individually and as estate administrator of Hannah Porter against Crystal Steinheimer; Michael J’s Saloon; Michael J. Stefani; KBB Growth LLC, doing business as Water St. Bar & Grill; Just Sue’s; and Susan K. Levery; alleging the wrongful death of her daughter Hannah in January.

According to the complaint, Hannah Porter died on or about Jan. 10, when a car in which she was traveling as a passenger on IL-159 in Monroe County was struck by Steinheimer as she allegedly crossed the center line. The plaintiff accuses Steinheimer of failure to control her vehicle, keep a lookout, and stay in her designated lane.

The driver of the vehicle Porter was in also died, and a second passenger was injured, the suit states.

Invoking the Illinois Wrongful Death Statute, Illinois Survival Statute, and Illinois Dramshop Act, Dawn Porter alleges the decedent sustained pain, anguish, disability, disfigurement, medical bills and lost income before succumbing to her injuries.

Additionally citing grief and loss of a loved one, the plaintiff accuses all three bars, located in Evansville, and their respective owners of over-serving Steinheimer on the same date prior to the collision.

Seeking judgment for more than $75,000 plus attorney’s fees and costs, she is represented by Samantha Unsell of Keefe & Keefe in Belleville .

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 15-L-470

Driver sues motorist following collision in Clay Street intersection

$
0
0

A St. Clair County resident is suing a motorist for alleged vehicular negligence in a collision, which she claims was caused by the defendant’s failure to obey a traffic light.

Melanie L. Nesbit of Shiloh filed a lawsuit on Aug. 19 in St. Clair County Circuit Court against Ronda J. Morris of Caseyville, alleging negligence in the August 2014 intersection crash.

According to the complaint, Nesbit was headed northbound on Vandalia Street near its junction with Clay Street on Aug. 10, 2014, when the defendant, headed west on Clay, allegedly crashed “violently” into the plaintiff’s vehicle, causing personal injuries to the plaintiff.

The suit charges the defendant with breach of duty and negligence for disobeying a traffic signal, failing to keep a proper lookout for other vehicles, yield to traffic, reduce speed to avoid an accident, apply brakes, maneuver or steer the automobile and stop before colliding with the plaintiff.

Nesbit alleges head, neck and back injuries, pain and suffering, disability and disfigurement, lost income, and medical expenses as a direct and proximate result of the defendant’s actions.

The plaintiff seeks judgment in her favor for more than $50,000 plus attorney’s fees and costs. She is represented by Marc Parker of Parker Law in Maryville.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 15-L-467

Passenger sues driver of oncoming car alleging personal injuries

$
0
0

A Madison County resident is suing another motorist over allegations of vehicular negligence in an automobile accident on state Route 143 in Madison County.

Jamie Offerman filed a lawsuit Aug. 26 in Madison County Circuit Court against Kaitlyn Bethany of Highland, alleging various traffic-related infringements in an August 2014 two-car collision.

The lawsuit states that on or about Aug. 22, 2014, when the plaintiff was a passenger in a vehicle stopped at the intersection of state Route 143 and U.S. Route 40 in Madison County, the vehicle in which she was riding was struck by Bethany from the rear.

According to the complaint, the defendant carelessly and negligently followed the plaintiff’s vehicle too closely; failed to keep a proper lookout for other vehicles, obey the rules of the road, exercise reasonable care in the operation of a motor vehicle, reduce speed to avoid an accident, apply brakes, and stop before colliding with the plaintiff.

The suit states that the plaintiff sustained physical injuries causing pain and suffering, lost income, lost enjoyment of life, medical bills, and disability as a direct and proximate result of the defendant’s actions.

The plaintiff seeks judgment in her favor for more than $50,000 plus attorney’s fees and costs. She is represented by Matthew Young of Kuehn, Beasley & Young in Belleville.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 15-L-1093

Madison County asbestos jury docket Sept. 21

$
0
0

Madison County Asbestos Jury Docket:




Monday, September 21




9 a.m.




LEESMANN KENNETH V. 4520 CORP INC

14-L-001035, ASBESTOS J 327




MOOK ROBERT G V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

14-L-000581, ASBESTOS J 327




GRAVES GEORGE ANDREW INDIVIDUA V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

14-L-000670, ASBESTOS J 327




FAIRLEY CONNIE INDIVIDUALLY V. AFC HOLCROFT LLC

11-L-001127, ASBESTOS J 327




CARTER WANDA LEE THE EST OF LE V. 4520 CORP INC

14-L-000136, ASBESTOS J 327




FORSYTH ROBERT D V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

14-L-001088, ASBESTOS J 327




BUTLER RALPH I V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

15-L-000140, ASBESTOS J 327




LOHMANN JOACHIM V. AII ACQUISITIONS LLC FKA AII A

15-L-000275, ASBESTOS J 327




JARABEK BERNARD INDIVIDUALLY V. AFC HOLCROFT LLC

12-L-001627, ASBESTOS J 327




NERTI ANNA JEAN INDIVIDUALLY V. AFC HOLCROFT LLC

12-L-001732, ASBESTOS J 327




MEYER ARLENE INDIVIDUALLY V. A O SMITH CORPORATION

12-L-001826, ASBESTOS J 327




TARVER WILLIAM BRUCE INDIVIDUA V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S

12-L-002050, ASBESTOS J 327




WEIR ROBERT L V. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY

13-L-000439, ASBESTOS J 327




HUNTER JANICE INDIVIDUALLY V. 3M COMPANY

13-L-000890, ASBESTOS J 327




LANSDALE ROBERT A V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI

13-L-001396, ASBESTOS J 327




MARTIN JAMES L V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

13-L-001553, ASBESTOS J 327




KLOS GLENN V. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY

13-L-001700, ASBESTOS J 327




GONZALEZ VENTURA II V. 4520 CORP INC FKA BENJAMIN F

13-L-001806, ASBESTOS J 327




SAVAGE ROBERT T JR V. 4520 CORP

13-L-001980, ASBESTOS J 327




SHEPHERD WILLA MAYE INDIVIDUAL V. 4520 CORP INC

13-L-002051, ASBESTOS J 327




MERIMEE JOSEPH W V. AII ACQUISITION LLC FKA AII AC

13-L-002165, ASBESTOS J 327




LEONARD DELMAR V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI

14-L-000313, ASBESTOS J 327




ASHTON BILLIE V. 84 LUMBER

14-L-000649, ASBESTOS J 327




KNAB GRETA INDIVIDUALLY V. AO SMITH CORPORATION

14-L-000997, ASBESTOS J 327




MCVETY MARGARET V. 84 LUMBER

14-L-001128, ASBESTOS J 327




LARSON STANLEY N V. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY

14-L-001373, ASBESTOS J 327




BLAND VIRGIL V. ADVANCED AUTO PARTS INC FKA WE

14-L-001549, ASBESTOS J 327




PEERY RICHARD V. 4520 CORP INC

14-L-001618, ASBESTOS J 327




WALTHER NEIL A V. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS

14-L-001631, ASBESTOS J 327




DIAZ JOSEPH A V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S

14-L-001672, ASBESTOS J 327




PENDER JAMES D SR V. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY

14-L-001677, ASBESTOS J 327




MCCOWN JAMES V. 84 LUMBER

15-L-000004, ASBESTOS J 327




VOSS GARY V. 84 LUMBER

15-L-000055, ASBESTOS J 327




NAPIER JAMES INDIVIDUALLY V. AFC HOLCROFT LLC

12-L-001628, ASBESTOS J 327




HOSKINS JAMES MICHAEL INDIVIDU V. 4520 CORP INC FKA BENJAMIN F S

13-L-001036, ASBESTOS J 327




HEDRICK MICHAEL INDIVIDUALLY V. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY

14-L-000104, ASBESTOS J 327




APLIN WILBER INDIVIDUALLY V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

14-L-000577, ASBESTOS J 327




BERNARD ROBERT A V. ADVANCED COMPOSITES GROUP

14-L-000580, ASBESTOS J 327




EBERT DANIEL V. 84 LUMBER

14-L-001166, ASBESTOS J 327




BRANDT LESTER V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S

13-L-002115, ASBESTOS J 327




BERNARD ROBERT A V. ADVANCED COMPOSITES GROUP

14-L-000580, ASBESTOS J 327




GOFF LARRY V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI

14-L-000818, ASBESTOS J 327




ST CLAIR BOBBY J V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

14-L-001375, ASBESTOS J 327




BARBARETTE GERARD V. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY

12-L-001410, ASBESTOS J 327




WOODWARD DON O V. AFTON PUMPS INC

12-L-001965, ASBESTOS J 327




WALLAGER RICHARD A V. 3M COMPANY

12-L-002073, ASBESTOS J 327




VERMILYEA WILLIAM A V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

13-L-001074, ASBESTOS J 327




PEARSON NATOSHA INDIVIDUALLY V. ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC

13-L-001217, ASBESTOS J 327




HOTCHKISS BELL ELIZABETH INDIV V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

13-L-001608, ASBESTOS J 327




HAMILTON JASMINE INDIVIDUALLY V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S

13-L-001837, ASBESTOS J 327




CAIN PATRICIA A V. AMERICAN BILTRITE INC

14-L-001443, ASBESTOS J 327




MAAGERO SVERRE V. AMERICAN BILTRITE INC

14-L-001752, ASBESTOS J 327




BURNS JC V. ADVANCED COMPOSITES GROUP

15-L-000120, ASBESTOS J 327




UNTERSEHER DENNIS D V. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS

15-L-000157, ASBESTOS J 327




CRAMPTOM GARY V. ALLIS CHALMERS

11-L-001228, ASBESTOS J 327




KNEBEL ANNA INDIVIDUALLY V. 4520 CORP INC FKA BENJAMIN F S

13-L-000032, ASBESTOS J 327




KNIERIEM TAMI LEE INDIVIDUALLY V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S

13-L-000033, ASBESTOS J 327




DUNSHEE ARLENE A INDIVIDUALLY V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S

13-L-000040, ASBESTOS J 327




VASVARI JOANNE INDIVIDUALLY V. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY

13-L-000248, ASBESTOS J 327




SHERMAN WALTER S V. 4520 CORP INC FKA BENJAMIN F S

13-L-001005, ASBESTOS J 327




TURNER JOAN INDIVIDUALLY V. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY

13-L-001034, ASBESTOS J 327




ST VINCENT FRANK V. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY

13-L-001075, ASBESTOS J 327




VROMAN SHERI LYNN INDIVIDUALLY V. 4520 CORP INC FKA BENJAMIN F S

13-L-001280, ASBESTOS J 327




WASSERMAN RICHARD C V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP SUC

13-L-001677, ASBESTOS J 327




SULLIVAN SUSAN INDIVIDUALLY V. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY

13-L-001763, ASBESTOS J 327




SIMMONS FOREST V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S

13-L-001780, ASBESTOS J 327




SPRAGUE LOREN H V. AFTON PUMPS, INC

13-L-001839, ASBESTOS J 327




DYBZINSKI MARY INDIVIDUALLY V. ALBERICI CONSTRUCTORS INC

13-L-001985, ASBESTOS J 327




TODD JIM F V. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY

13-L-002114, ASBESTOS J 327




PUCKETT RONALD V. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY

13-L-002116, ASBESTOS J 327




CARRASCO ROBERT C V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

13-L-002167, ASBESTOS J 327




FINCHER JEFFERSON INDIVIDUALLY V. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY

14-L-000025, ASBESTOS J 327




GREGG DENNIS V. 4520 CORP INC

14-L-000159, ASBESTOS J 327




TORSIELLO RONALD V. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS

14-L-000959, ASBESTOS J 327




LENARD AARON INDIVIDUALLY V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

14-L-000578, ASBESTOS J 327

Madison County asbestos motion docket Sept. 21-25

$
0
0

Madison County Asbestos Motion Docket:




Monday, September 21




9 a.m.




LEONARD DELMAR V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP SUCC

14-L-000313, ASBESTOS J 327




DEGHELDER JOSEPH V. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY

14-L-000805, ASBESTOS J 327




PETERSON RONALD V. 84 LUMBER

14-L-001257, ASBESTOS J 327




ASHBY CAROL INDIVIDUALLY V. ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC FKA WES

14-L-001276, ASBESTOS J 327




LARSON STANLEY N V. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY

14-L-001373, ASBESTOS J 327




VERBLE ROBERT V. ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC AKA ADV

13-L-001091, ASBESTOS J 327




CAIN PATRICIA A V. AMERICAN BILTRITE INC

14-L-001443, ASBESTOS J 327




MAAGERO SVERRE V. AMERICAN BILTRITE INC

14-L-001752, ASBESTOS J 327




BURNS JC V. DAP INC

15-L-000120, ASBESTOS J 327




JOHANSEN DENNIS INDIVIDUALLY V. AEROQUIP CORPORATION

13-L-002164, ASBESTOS J 327




WITHERSPOON DENNIS V. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY

12-L-000787, ASBESTOS J 327







Friday, September 25




9 a.m.




MURPHY SHIRLEY A INDIVIDUALLY V. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORA

15-L-000457, ASBESTOS J 327




SATTERFIELD HIRAM V. ABB INC SUCC TO ITE ELECTRICAL

15-L-000509, ASBESTOS J 327




BURTON IRIS INDIVIDUALLY V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

13-L-001609, ASBESTOS J 327




BRENT WILLIAM INDIVIDUALLY V. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO IN

14-L-000879, ASBESTOS J 327




RYDER DIANA INDIVIDUALLY V. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

14-L-001346, ASBESTOS J 327




EAVEY NORMA INDIVIDUALLY V. 84 LUMBER

14-L-001736, ASBESTOS J 327




THERRELL JAMES B INDIVIDUALLY V. ALL CRAFT CERAMICS INC

14-L-000754, ASBESTOS J 327




WOLFGANG JUDITH INDIVIDUALLY V. AJAX MAGNATHERMIC CORPORATION

13-L-000243, ASBESTOS J 327




GURRERA CONSTANCE J INDIVIDUAL V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI

13-L-000948, ASBESTOS J 327




DANZ KAREN INDIVIDUALLY V. AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC

13-L-001375, ASBESTOS J 327




JESTES HERMAN R V. 4520 CORP INC FKA BENJAMIN F S

13-L-002117, ASBESTOS J 327




HAYES JANET L INDIVIDUALLY V. AFTON PUMPS INC

14-L-000026, ASBESTOS J 327




EDWARDS ELIZABETH J INDIVIDUAL V. ALBEMARLE CORP

14-L-000606, ASBESTOS J 327




PAUL RODNEY V. ABB INC SUCC TO ITE ELECTRICAL

14-L-001496, ASBESTOS J 327




CANTANZARO LOUIS J V. AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORA

14-L-001725, ASBESTOS J 327




MCCLINTOCK WILLIAM C V. ABB INC SUCC TO ITE ELECTRICAL

15-L-000019, ASBESTOS J 327




TVEDTEN DIANE R V. SQUARE D CO

15-L-000313, ASBESTOS J 327




MARSH SHELLY A V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

15-L-000367, ASBESTOS J 327




GRZYWINSKI RAY V. AFTON PUMPS INC

15-L-000396, ASBESTOS J 327




BROWN NEIL V. 4520 CORP INC SUCCESSOR IN INT

15-L-000578, ASBESTOS J 327




CZARNOMSKI LORETTA INDIVIDUALL V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

13-L-001077, ASBESTOS J 327




WESTON JAMES V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

14-L-001568, ASBESTOS J 327




CARACCI ROCCO V. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP

15-L-000496, ASBESTOS J 327




DAVIS ALBERT F JR V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI

15-L-000563, ASBESTOS J 327




MEYERS DOLORES V. AMERICAN ART CLAY CO INC

15-L-000765, ASBESTOS J 327




FOCHTMAN LOUIS V. AGCO CORP FKA MASSEY-FERGUSON

15-L-000250, ASBESTOS J 327




SREBERNAK SUSAN V. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP

15-L-000305, ASBESTOS J 327




GRAVEL ROGER R V. 3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ

15-L-000424, ASBESTOS J 327




DUFUR GEORGIA INDIVIDUALLY V. 84 LUMBER

15-L-000800, ASBESTOS J 327




COOK JAMIE L INDIVIDUALLY V. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

15-L-000032, ASBESTOS J 327




WICHMANN CORINNE INDIVIDUALLY V. AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC

13-L-001354, ASBESTOS J 327




LONDON MICHAEL INDIVIDUALLY V. A W CHESTERTON INC

14-L-000101, ASBESTOS J 327




GUALANDI JOHN V. AGCO CORP DBA AGCO FARM EQUIPM

14-L-000412, ASBESTOS J 327




HOLLAND SUE INDIVIDUALLY V. ARVINMERITOR INC IND AND AS SU

14-L-000924, ASBESTOS J 327




ICKES AMBER INDIVIDUALLY V. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC

14-L-001668, ASBESTOS J 327




KLEINKE CHARLES INDIVIDUALLY V. ARVINMERITOR INC

15-L-000125, ASBESTOS J 327




MAXWELL BRIDGET B V. AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI

15-L-000520, ASBESTOS J 327




JUSTICE WILLIAM V. 4520 CORP., INC

13-L-001940, ASBESTOS J 327




BURNEY PHILLIP INDIVIDUALLY V. UNION CARBIDE CORP

14-L-000018, ASBESTOS J 327




GILLINGHAM JAMES V. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP

14-L-000726, ASBESTOS J 327




SAVAGLIO BENJAMIN V. ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC FKA WES

14-L-001413, ASBESTOS J 327




SHAIN JOSEPH V. AW CHESTERTON COMPANY

14-L-001602, ASBESTOS J 327




KIRBY JO ELLEN V. A W CHESTERTON COMPANY

15-L-000127, ASBESTOS J 327




WOLBERS HAROLD V. CARLISLE INDUSTRIAL BRAKE AND

15-L-000777, ASBESTOS J 327




HAMPTON QUEENIE V. AW CHESTERTON INC

13-L-000811, ASBESTOS J 327

Illinois pays millions in pension benefits to the dead

$
0
0

The Illinois Supreme Court ruled in May that pension benefits flowing to government retirees can never be “diminished or impaired.” A new investigation into state and local pension records reveals this ironclad protection can extend beyond the grave.

From 2010 to 2014, 11 of Illinois’ 15 largest pension funds paid out $2.2 million in pension benefits to more than 1,000 dead people. Those funds later tried to recoup the payments to deceased pensioners, according to a joint investigation by the Better Government Association and the Chicago Sun-Times. When including overpayments to workers on disability and workers who have lost their pensions because of felony convictions, 13 of the largest funds paid out nearly $3.5 million in improper pension benefits over the five-year period.

The most expensive single case occurred between 2004 and 2010, when $200,000 in pension payments was deposited into a bank account that had belonged to William A. Galvin Jr. A city of Chicago truck driver, Galvin died in October 2004.

Right now, Illinois’ government pension funds rely heavily on family members’ and health insurers’ reporting of pensioners’ deaths – a faulty and easily gamed system. Gov. Bruce Rauner in July signed legislation requiring the Department of Human Services to conduct a monthly crosscheck of its aid recipients with the death records kept by the Department of Public Health. The same requirement should extend to all state and local pension funds in Illinois.

The nation’s most severe pension crisis – which politicians have proposed solving through historic tax hikes – demands as much.

Illinoisans should also keep in mind that shoddy record-keeping in this area wouldn’t be such an issue if government employees were enrolled in 401(k)-style retirement plans rather than the antiquated defined-benefit plans provided to government workers currently.

Austin Berg is a writer for the Illinois Policy Institute.

What happens when Illinois taxpayers refused to be ignored

$
0
0

Ignoring Illinois taxpayers has consequences.

For decades, state politicians have ignored the opinions of the Illinoisans who fund the state budget. Now, on top of politicians failing to pass a balanced budget, Illinois Comptroller Leslie Munger announced the state could face more than $8.5 billion in unpaid bills by the end of the year.

Ignoring taxpayers also had consequences for state Rep. Carol Sente, D-Vernon Hills, who decided to ignore the wishes of her constituents in her vote to override Gov. Bruce Rauner’s veto of Senate Bill 1229.

The bill would have given an unelected and unaccountable panel of three arbitrators the ability to set the terms of the next contract for the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, worth billions of dollars.

Sente’s district was one of many legislative districts Illinois Policy Action reached leading up to the SB 1229 veto vote. Through robo-calls, full-page newspaper ads, social media alerts and boots on the ground canvassing, residents in 35 different lawmakers’ districts were informed of the pending vote. The results were overwhelming, with 5,836 taxpayers calling their lawmakers and collectively spending over 100 hours of talk time on this issue.

The Illinois House of Representatives ended up falling three votes short of passing an override of Rauner’s veto.

Things are changing in Springfield. When pondering, “What can I do?” Illinoisans should think about all the individuals who collectively changed the entire narrative in this debate. And how without them, House Speaker Mike Madigan would have fulfilled his promise of overriding Rauner’s veto.

So next time you receive a mailer or phone call, or are handed literature at the train station that includes a call to action on an issue you agree with, remember this: You might just be the one final call that gets your representative to vote with the taxpayers.

Jim Long is the manager of government affairs with the Illinois Policy Institute.


Justice Moore plans to announce candidacy for vacant appellate seat

$
0
0

With two vacant appellate court seats, appointed Appellate Judge James “Randy” Moore intends to announce his plan to seek election to the Fifth District Appellate Court.

His Tuesday press conference in Mount Vernon was postponed.  

Moore plans to run on the Republican ticket for former Justice James M. Wexstten’s seat that was left vacant after he announced his retirement in January.

In March 2014, the Illinois Supreme Court appointed S. Gene Schwarm of the Fourth Judicial Circuit to serve for the remainder of Wexstten’s term, which expires in December 2016.

State Sen. Dave Luechtefeld (R-Okawville) is serving as Moore’s campaign chairman.

More was elected in 2008 and was recently retained in 2014 to the deep southern Illinois First Circuit Court based in Marion.

Moore earned his bachelor’s degree in economics from the Southern Illinois University in Carbondale in 1974.

He later received his juris doctor from Southern Illinois University School of Law in 1977.

Moore began working as an assistant city attorney for the City of Carbondale until he founded his own law firm in 1979.

Then in 2007, Moore was appointed to the First Judicial Circuit Court based in Marion, Ill. He then successfully ran for election in 2008 and was retained again in 2014.

He was assigned to the Fifth District Appellate Court on Jan. 2 by the seven-member Illinois Supreme Court.

Moore has been a trustee of the Judicial Retirement System since 2012.

Moore and his wife Cynthia have been married since 1975. They have eight children and ten grandchildren.

Second Judicial Circuit Court Judge Jo Beth Weber and First Judicial Circuit Judge Brad Bleyer are also running on the Democratic ticket for Wexstten’s seat.

Schwarm, a Republican from rural Fayette County, said he will not be seeking the seat he currently occupies. He plans to retire following his 22-year judicial career when his term expires.

Herndon denies motion to stay pending appeal in Lightspeed case

$
0
0

After U.S. District Judge David Herndon issued an order staying sanctions against three attorneys who allegedly obstructed discovery in a computer hacking case involving port sites, he denied their motions to stay proceedings pending an appeal by sanctioned attorney John Steele.

Herndon wrote that briefing shall proceed in accordance to his Aug. 12 order.

Steele appealed to the Seventh Circuit on Aug. 7 following Herndon’s June 5 order sanctioning him and fellow attorneys Paul Hansmeier and Paul Duffy in Lightspeed v. Anthony Smith for engaging in “unreasonable, willful obstruction of discovery in bad faith.” The case was originally brought in St. Clair County and was later removed to federal court by AT&T.

Steele, Hansmeier and Duffy were partners at Prenda Law, a Chicago firm that dissolved in 2013 after U.S. District Judge Otis Wright of the Central District of California hammered the trio for deceiving the court in a copyright infringement case. He said the lawyers engaged in “brazen misconduct” with their attempts at “outmaneuvering” the legal system.

Represented by attorney Dan Booth of Booth Sweet LLP in Cambridge, Mass., Smith filed a designation of record and notice for order on Sept. 4, designating the complete transcript of the Nov. 12, 2014, hearing necessary as part of the record on appeal, along with all in camera filings.

The November hearing was held to address Smith’s motion for contempt and discovery sanctions.

At the hearing, Steele indicated that he “never intentionally made misrepresentations to third parties” to obstruct discovery. He also denied misrepresenting his financial status.

During the hearing, the court ultimately sanctioned Steele for contempt and found discovery sanctions appropriate.

The court imposed those discovery sanctions in its July 23 order after Smith submitted his expense report iteming the additional costs incurred as a result of what the court identified as Steele and Duffy’s discovery obstruction. He claimed $94,343.51 in incurred expenses for conducting third-party discovery. Steele and Duffy were ordered to pay the full amount, apportioned equally between the two.

Steele appealed. Prior to his appeal, Steele filed an objection to the sanction on July 17, arguing that the actual cost of third-party discovery should not have exceeded $531.40. He likened Smith’s attempt to receive “inflated” costs to fraud and wrote that his actions amounted to a Class A felony.

However, Booth wrote, “At the hearing, Steele made further in camera filings and argued against Smith’s motions making misrepresentations that will be squarely at issue in his appeal. Therefore, a hearing transcript should be included in the record on appeal, along with all in camera filings.”

In his designation, Booth wrote that Steele’s reason for not ordering the hearing transcript is that “’[t]he District Court granted a motion for reconsideration without a hearing.’”

“That is a red herring. Steele is not appealing from the court’s grant of reconsideration but from its later entry of sanctions,” Booth wrote.

He added that Steele’s reason is irrelevant, because that type of motion for reconsideration does not require a hearing in court.

Two class actions alleging ‘all natural’ misrepresentation dismissed; Case against Grecian Delight remains

$
0
0

Two of three class actions filed in St. Clair County that allege food items falsely claiming they are “all natural” have been dismissed. The case against Grecian Delight is the only one still being litigated.

The suits say the products all contain a synthetic chemical – sodium acid pyrophosphate, or SAPP – which also is used to remove iron stains in leather products, as an oil drilling fluid and to de-feather poultry.

They also say that excessive intake of SAPP can lead to imbalanced levels of minerals in the body and osteoporosis.

“[T]he FDA has said (it) has no place in purportedly all natural products,” the suits say.

Plaintiff Jaime Blankenship brought two of the cases – one against 3 Fellers Bakery of Goochland, Va. Over its Coffee Cake Bars and another against Grecian Delights Foods of Elk Grove Village over its Hand Stretched Naan flatbread.

Plaintiff Timothy Blankenship is suing Dancing Deer Baking Co. of Boston over its All Natural Gluten Free Oatmeal Raisin Cookies.

Associate Judge Randall Kelley dismissed with prejudice the suit against 3 Fellers Bakery on Aug. 19 after Blankenship’s attorney David C. Nelson of Nelson & Nelson in Belleville filed a stipulation for dismissal.

Similarly, Kelley dismissed without prejudice the suit against Dancing Deer Baking on June 8 after Nelson filed a stipulation for dismissal on June 2.

Both plaintiffs say they made their purchases at Fresh Thyme Farmers Market, which opened in January. The store describes itself as offering “value-priced fresh, healthy, natural and organic” items.

The plaintiffs seek damages for the defendants’ alleged “false, deceptive, unfair and misleading marketing and advertising” in violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.

They say the defendants are “taking advantage of a growing market of truly all natural products by labeling products as ‘All Natural’ that are not.”

The plaintiffs say they seek no more than $75,000 per class member and $4,999,999 for the entire class - $1 less than a federal jurisdiction requirement.

Circuit Judge Vincent Lopinot scheduled a status conference for the remaining case against Grecian Delight on Oct. 19 at 9 a.m.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case numbers 15-L-254 (3 Fellers Bakery), 15-L-255 (Grecian Delight) and 15-L-256 (Dancing Deer Baking)

We're Number One! We're Number One!

$
0
0

We all want to be the best at something: the best athlete, the best musician, the best actor, the best whatever it is we've chosen to be.

Winning an Olympic gold medal or a Grammy or an Oscar is often the highlight of a person's career, something most of us can only dream of.

It is possible, though, for many of us to be the best at something, somewhere, if the thing we've chosen to excel at is odd enough and our circle of competitors sufficiently small.

Being the worst at something is also a distinction, but not one many aspire to – except, perhaps, in jest or in one of those oddball competitions that reward failure (e.g., a poker game in which the pot goes to the worst hand).

Unfortunately, being the worst at something, or among the worst, is a distinction that the State of Illinois has earned, along with Cook and Madison Counties.

This distinction, which our state and these two counties have borne for years, was recently reaffirmed by a survey commissioned by the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (owner of this newspaper) to evaluate the fairness and reasonableness of state liability systems across the country. The 2015 Lawsuit Climate Survey was conducted by Harris Poll, using a national sample of 1,203 in-house general counsel, senior litigators or attorneys, and other senior executives at companies with at least $100 million in annual revenues.

Cook County was ranked as the second worst local jurisdiction in the country, Madison County as the fourth. That pathetic performance brought our whole state down, relegating Illinois to the status of 48th (i.e., third worst).

Illinois ranked 49th for “treatment of class actions and mass consolidation” cases, and dead last in enforcing venue requirements and preventing venue shopping.

These negative achievements have serious consequences for the economy of our state and the well-being of our people.  Only the most twisted person could celebrate them. The rest of us must strive to correct them.

Associate Judge Schuette appointed to family division in Madison County

$
0
0

Recently selected Madison County Associate Judge Maureen D. Schuette, 53, has been assigned to the family docket, a division she has a history of experience in.

 “These are dockets where it’s very emotional for people,” she said. “It’s harder for them because they are going to court and their property and their children are going to be impacted, their lives are impacted.”

“They want to be heard, and I want to treat them with respect and kindness,” she added.

Schuette said she is thrilled to begin her new position as judge.

“I am so excited to be working with such an amazing group of talented judges,” she said.

Schuette is the second oldest of seven children and grew up in Edwardsville. Her dad was a mechanical engineer and staff engineer with Shell Oil Company and her mom stayed home before going to work at the county clerk’s office. She later worked on the zoning board of appeals.

Schuette currently lives in Edwardsville with her husband Greg, who is assistant county engineer, and their three children Tom, Marissa and Nick.

“They’ve been tremendously supportive of me,” Schuette said of her family.

She said her interest in law began when she was a young girl and she would listen to her attorney uncle talk about his trials while sitting at her grandma’s kitchen table, which she found fascinating.

Her interest developed further when she worked at the county clerk’s office for five years, where she worked a lot with the attorneys. She said she enjoyed the environment and loved the people.

Schuette graduated from SIUE in 1984 with a degree in government. She later earned her juris doctor from the University of Puget Sound School of Law in Tacoma, Wash., which is now part of Seattle University.

While in law school, Schuette worked at a criminal defense firm and served as vice president of the law school. During her last two years of law school, she came back to Madison County during the summers to work in the state’s attorney’s office doing criminal and child support cases.

Following graduation, she did general practice law before opening her own practice in Edwardsville in 1993. She worked in every area of law but focused on family law at her private practice.

She was also in charge of the family division for the Third Judicial Circuit’s pro bono practice.

Schuette has also had experience as an arbitrator since March of 2007 and works as a mediator.

“I think that’s going to help me on the bench,” she said.

“Over the years, I worked in almost every single area of the law,” she added. “Luckily, I’ve gained proficiency in almost every area.”

Schuette’s personal experiences also helped prepare her for her new role over the family law division. She said she lost her dad and sister to cancer, which gave her a new appreciation for people in general.

“I truly appreciate every day and I am thankful for every day,” she said.

As part of her new appointment to the family docket, she said she will have to adjust to the changes happening in family law, including changes to the definition of “custody” as well as changes to the Dissolution of Marriage Act, among others.

Schuette said she is passionate about working with people in the legal field.

“I really really enjoy working with people, and that’s why I think the family law area will just be tremendous,” she said.

“Over the years, I have been taught to work hard, to be kind and to be thankful and be humble and treat others with respect. It will be fun to treat litigants with the same kindness and fairness and dignity,” she added.

Schuette is a member of the Madison County Bar Association and Illinois State Bar Association. She used to be a member of the American Bar Association and American Trial Lawyers Association.

She received the 2015 Public Interest Law Initiative Pro Bono award, the American Jurisprudence Award in Advance Family Law and was selected as a Leading Lawyers member.

Her swearing in ceremony will be held on Oct. 9 at the Madison County Circuit Court in Edwardsville.

Associate Judge Flack says he is grateful to return to the bench

$
0
0

Madison County Associate Judge Donald M. Flack, 45, said he is humbled after he was not retained as associate judge and then later selected as one of five to fill the vacancies, but stressed that he respected the circuit judges’ decisions.

“If it’s possible, it might be more humbling,” he said. “I might be more grateful. I might be more appreciative the second time around.”

Flack said he held no hard feelings and appreciated the new opportunity and smooth transition.

“It was really humbling at first. I had to go back to the same judges who just voted on retention and ask to be reappointed,” he said.

“But every single one of the circuit judges were extremely gracious and welcoming. They made the process as easily as possible on me, which I appreciate.”

“It really just became an exercise in patience, as it is for everyone. You apply and make your case, then all you can do is wait it out and hope for the best.”

“It went as well as I could have expected considering all of the circumstances,” he continued.

The five seats were left open when Flack and fellow associate judges Duane L. Bailey, Ben L. Beyers, II, David Grounds and Elizabeth Levy were no retained in the spring to terms that would have begun July 1.

Only three other associate judges failed to get re-appointed in the entire state.

“It is unusual, but if you keep it in perspective, we have nine circuit judges elected by the people, charged with a pretty awesome responsibility of ensuring justice,” he added. “Part of that, or course, is appointing the associate judges. And having the privilege to serve with these nine circuit judges before and serving with them now, I know they take that job very seriously. I have great respect for all of them, so I know that all nine of them are trying to do what is best for the people in Madison County.”

Flack said he felt that the circuit judges did “everything they could to ensure that the best people” were selected to serve as associate judges.

“They all absolutely did what they thought was right with respect to the retention and the new judges,” he said.

Flack attended SIUE in Edwardsville, where he earned a degree in business economics. He then went on to receive his juris doctor at the St. Louis University School of Law in St. Louis.

Flack said his interest in the legal field came from an older cousin who was a practicing attorney in Michigan. But he really began thinking about law as a career while studying business in college. He said he saw how it impacted everyone’s life and realized “there are a lot of situations that develop that someone else is going to solve.” He wanted to be the one to solve those problems.

“The more I saw that, the more I came to believe it was something I wanted to become a part of, because it could have such an effect on people,” he said.

When he began law school, Flack said he got to know new lawyers and began developing new professional relationships with attorneys he had grown up around, but hadn’t paid much attention to their legal careers until he was studying law.

While attending in law school, Flack did summer work with larger firms in St. Louis, where he learned that he preferred trial work.

After graduation, he began working at the Bethalto firm Pratt & Tobin, where he was able to try jury and non-jury trials early on in his career.

He also served as an assistant state’s attorney for about three years and served as council for Madison County Development.

He then left to work for the larger firm Korein & Tillary, where he continued to gain trial experience.

While there, one of Flack’s cases involved a wrongful death lawsuit alleging Huck’s convenience stores unfairly and deceptively schemed to get customers to buy “light” cigarettes.

He filed the case in 2005 on behalf of Michael Kelly, who claims his father Everett Kelly died from lung cancer in 2003 after smoking Marlboro Lights cigarettes for nearly 30 years.

Flack was lead counsel in the case until he was sworn in for his first term as associate judge in 2012.

Ten years later, the case is still being litigated (05-L-123).

He eventually opened his own firm in Wood River, where he practiced for four years before being selected as an associate judge in 2012.

His private firm focused on general trial work, where he did everything from defense litigation to plaintiff personal injury litigation. He also did some business litigation.

“If it involved going into a courtroom, I was probably willing to take it on,” he said.

After taking the bench, Flack said he was able to preside in almost every type of division at the Madison County courthouse in some way during his three years there, which he said “was an amazing experience to see all the avenues of the law work.”

Flack said he is passionate about the legal field’s ability to administer fairness.

“I think the biggest thing that drew me and keeps me interested in the law is this sense of justice or fairness,” he said.

“The key to me, my passion about the law is my sense of justice or fairness. The goal for me as a judge is to respect the legal process. I want every lawyer and litigant to feel like they had their day in court. That they were allowed to tell their story and present their evidence and to feel like they were treated fairly regardless of whether they like the result of not,” he said.

He added that he believes the justice system in America is a sound one and his purpose is to make sure it runs the way it was created to work.

“I’m convinced that as far as I knew, no one has come up with a better system than ours,” he said.

“I try my best to work the system in the way it was intended,” he added.

Flack said he plans to continue improving as a judge during his second appointment.

“I intend to demonstrate my gratuity by doing my job the best I can,” he said.

“Regardless of the non-retention, just in terms of continuing to be a judge, I hope I’m always trying to be better.”

“This is a very demanding job and a very important one, I think. So I don’t want to ever stop trying to be better at it,” Flack continued.

Flack grew up in Bethalto, where he currently resides with his wife and three children.

“I grew up in the community and I feel like I have a great connection to it,” he said.

Flack said that when he is not working, his family takes up most of his free time. He said he is active with his kids’ school and sports events and his family is also very active at Cornerstone Church in Bethalto.

Woman accuses St. Clair police officer, third party of negligent highway driving

$
0
0

A woman is suing a motorist, a county municipal government and a police officer, charging reckless driving by the law enforcement officer and departmental negligence in 2014.

Tawana Payne filed a lawsuit Aug. 19 in St. Clair County Circuit Court against Carrol Rinehart III, St. Clair County, St. Clair County Sheriff’s Department of Belleville, and Jason Williams, alleging several counts of negligence in August 2014 automobile collisions in Shiloh.

According to the complaint, Payne was driving eastbound on Interstate 64 on or about Aug. 20, 2014, when Rinehart, a police officer, allegedly attempted to improperly pass and cut off her vehicle, resulting in Payne's vehicle being struck by Williams' vehicle. The suit states that Rinehart was on duty, but not involved in a law enforcement and/or emergency situation at the time.

Charging Rinehart and the department with operating his vehicle “at an outrageously high and excessive rate of speed for the time of day and area of travel,” failing to keep a lookout, observe the plaintiff, reduce speed, control his vehicle, and follow proper protocol, Payne claims to have sustained severe and permanent injuries.

Williams is charged with negligently operating his vehicle; the plaintiff claims that he also struck her car. The suit did not state the exact circumstances of Williams’ alleged collision.

Claiming loss of income and earning capacity, property damage, and medical bills as a direct and proximate result of the defendant’s actions, the plaintiff seeks more than $50,000 plus attorneys’ fees and costs. She is represented by Patrick Johnston and Benjamin Stephens of Johnston Law Offices in Edwardsville .

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 15-L-469


Lumberyard Suppliers sues H & M Construction over alleged unpaid debts

$
0
0

A Madison County lumber business is suing a St. Clair County construction firm and its owner, charging breach of contract in a matter spanning five years.

Lumberyard Suppliers Inc., doing business as LS Building Products, filed a lawsuit Aug. 25 in Madison County Circuit Court against Patrick Horton individually and doing business as H & M Construction, alleging unpaid debts from 2010 through 2014.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff sold and delivered goods to the defendant as solicited and documented in court files, for which the defendant promised to pay the plaintiff in full.

The suit states that despite repeated requests, Horton’s business currently allegedly owes LS Building Products the net sum of $108,059.39 after credits. According to the lawsuit, the defendant implicitly agreed to pay the plaintiff’s attorney’s fees and other costs of collection when it originally signed a contract with the company, as set forth on its credit application and guarantee documents.

Alleging lost income as a direct and proximate result of the defendant’s actions, the plaintiff requests the court to enter judgment in its favor for the stated amount, plus attorneys’ fees and costs. LS Building Products is represented by Mark Silvermintz of The Kunin Law Offices in Collinsville.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 15-L-1087

Injured woman charges driver with negligence following collision on Rock Road

$
0
0

A Madison County resident is suing a motorist on allegations of negligent driving in 2013 following an accident which she claims injured her.

Phyllis Campbell filed against Larry E. Douglas on Aug. 24 in Madison County Circuit Court, alleging several traffic violations in the November 2013 collision.

According to the complaint, the defendant was traveling westbound on Rock Road near the intersection of Route 3 in Granite City on or about Nov. 1, 2013. The suit states that Douglas failed to stop or swerve his vehicle at the appearance of danger, drove without keeping his automobile under sufficient control to avoid collision, operated the vehicle at too great a speed for the circumstances, and failed to keep an adequate lookout for traffic ahead of and to the side of his car, crashing into Campbell’s vehicle and causing injuries.

The suit states that Campbell sustained internal and external injuries, pain, suffering, anguish, limitation of daily activities, disability, loss of normal life and medical bills as a direct and proximate result of the defendant’s actions.

The plaintiff seeks judgment in her favor for more than $50,000 plus attorneys’ fees and costs. She is represented by Kenneth Beljanski and Trent West of Brown & Brown in Fairview Heights.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 15-L-1080

Parents sue motorist for medical expenses following collision

$
0
0

A Macoupin County family is suing a Madison County resident on allegations of vehicular negligence in a 2014 head-on collision which purportedly injured the entire family.

George Sronce and Jeanette Sronce filed a lawsuit individually and as next friends of their minor children, Brady Sronce and Brock Sronce, on Aug. 26 in Madison County Circuit Court against Ashley Silkwood of East Alton, alleging traffic violations in a November 2014 accident.

According to the complaint, George Sronce was driving a 2008 Honda CRV eastbound on Brighton-Bunker Hill Road in Brighton Township in Macoupin County with Jeanette, Brady and Brock as passengers on Nov. 16, 2014.

The suit states that Silkwood, operating a 2002 Dodge Durango westbound on the same road, collided with the plaintiffs’ automobile, injuring all four occupants. She is charged with failing to control her vehicle, operate at a safe speed, keep a proper lookout, reduce speed and change lanes safely.

Invoking the Family Expense Act, the plaintiffs contend that both children suffered internal injuries and back injuries requiring medical attention, pharmaceutical intervention and expenses as a direct and proximate result of the defendant’s actions.

The Sronces seek judgment in their favor for more than $50,000 plus attorney’s fees and costs. The family is represented by Richard Reed of Reed and Bruhn in Belleville.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 15-L-1094

Worker sues Ashley Furniture claiming blatant age discrimination

$
0
0

A resident is charging her employer with violation of the Illinois Human Rights Act based on her treatment from 2011 to the present.

Debra Frakes filed a lawsuit Aug. 24 in Madison County Circuit Court against Dufrenese Spencer Group, doing business as Ashley Furniture, and DSG Missouri LLC, also doing business as Ashley Furniture, alleging age discrimination and wrongful treatment at her job over the course of her employment.

According to the complaint, the defendant, a furniture retail operation, hired Frakes on May 11, 2011. She avers that the company failed to consider or train her for promotion based on her age (now 61); that it instead promoted persons outside of the plaintiff’s protected age group who were allegedly less qualified and untrained; and permitted employees to make “age critical remarks” to her.

Additionally, the suit states, the defendant not only failed to reimburse the plaintiff for management training testing, but also forced her to give up the training; paid her less than her counterparts; and failed to respond to her complaints to HR regarding age discrimination in the workplace.

Claiming lost wages and humiliation, Frakes seeks judgment in her favor for more than $50,000 plus attorney’s fees and costs. She is represented by Thomas Falb of Williamson, Webster, Falb & Glisson in Alton.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 15-L-1081

Accident victim’s parents allege reckless driver was a drug user

$
0
0

A Madison County mother and father are bringing a driver to court on charges of negligent entrustment in a 2013 roadway collision that injured their daughter.

Lauri S. Paitz and Jacob B. Paitz filed a lawsuit Aug. 24 in Madison County Circuit Court individually and as next friends of minor Audrey L. Paitz, against Darren Wendt, alleging that he recklessly lent his vehicle to Amanda Copeland of Collinsville in August 2013.

According to the complaint, Jacob Paitz was transporting his wife and daughter headed southbound on Highway 157 near its junction with Main Street in Glen Carbon on or about Aug. 23, 2013. The plaintiffs maintain that when their vehicle was stopped at a red light, Wendt’s vehicle “slammed into and collided with the rear” of the plaintiff’s auto, causing it to run into a third vehicle.

The lawsuit states that Wendt, who was Copeland’s roommate or boyfriend, is guilty of negligent entrustment based on allegations that Copeland was a habitual drug user. Knowing that she was likely to be impaired and under the influence of controlled substances, the suit states, the defendant owed a duty to prevent Copeland from driving his car.

Audrey’s parents allege that she sustained severe injuries and scarring, disability, anguish, loss of a normal life, and medical expenses. Lauri Paitz was also allegedly injured.

The plaintiffs seek judgment in their favor for more than $50,000 plus attorneys’ fees and costs. They are represented by Brian Wendler and Ellen Burford of Wendler Law in Edwardsville, Illinois.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 15-L-1076

Viewing all 22043 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>