St. Clair County real estate Jan. 3-12

January 24, 2017, 8:20 am

≫ Next: St. Clair County foreclosures Jan. 6-11

≪ Previous: Madison County real estate Jan. 3-6

$

0

0

JANUARY 3, 2017

BELLEVILLE

$300,000- 106 WILD ROSE DR. - MICHAELLE VAZQUEZ TO JAMES AND NICOLE MCANULTY
$142,500- 1713 SPRUCE HILL DR. - MARIE KURKEY TO KYLEIGH LAPOINT
$228,000- 2645 CHEYENNE WELLS DR. - ZACHARY AND LINDSI YODER TO STEPHANIE NGUYEN
$200,000- 8 PERRY LN. - KENNETH AND KARIN ANDERSSON TO DENNIS MARES AND EMILY BLACKBURN
$33,000- 3900 MEMORIAL - FIRST COUNTY BANK TO ROLLINGBROOK PROPERTIES
$165,000- 2753 CEDAR GROVE DR. - MCBRIDE GREEN MOUNT MANOR TO ARLINGTON HOMES
$117,500- 2 PINECREST CR. - KATHERINE SCHNAKE TO PATRICIA QUARLES
$72,500- 928 PEONY DR. - DIANE RICE TO STEPHANIE SCHMITT
$27,000- 28 S. 8TH ST. - MINNIE STEINHOFF TO MICHAEL JOHNSON
$77,000- 111 N 81ST ST. - MARILYN SMITHSON TO MARIUS REABET AND LILIAN TANG

CAHOKIA

$9,100- 1130 ST. MARGARET DR. - FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE TO CRYSTAL DIXON

FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS

$12,000- 14 ROSELAWN AVE. - FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS TO RICHARD AND ANNA SHEPARD
$69,500- 6100 OLD COLLINSVILLE RD. - HIERS OF MARILYN WARREN TO ROBERTO AND MIRAN CALDERON

MASCOUTAH

$75,000- 423 W. MAIN ST. - PEOPLES NATIONAL BANK TO SCOTT VAN BOKEL
$487,410- XXX BEE HOLLOW RD. - CENTRAL STATES COAL RESERVES OF IL TO CHARLES DRESSLER

MILLSTADT

$197,000- 2446 IMBS STATION RD. - ERIC AND SHARI HOFSTETTER TO THOMAS HALFHILL

NEW ATHENS

$522,000- 1102 SPOTSYLVANIA ST. - NORRENBERNS FOODS TO JAY KUBAR INC.

OFALLON

$89,900- 28 RAVENWOOD CR. - RICH GORAZD INC. TO LF AND SON CONSTRUCTION CO.
$58,500- 246 EAGLE RIDGE - MATTHEW MARTY AND SUSAN MEINEN TO PHB CAPITAL
$102,500- 1325 STONE HILL DR., 1004 SUNNYRIDGE CT., 1043 RICHLAND PRAIRIE DR. - STONE BRIDGE ESTATES DEVELOPMENT CO. TO MCBRIDE STONE BRIDGE
$282,121- 960 CARNEGIE KNOLLS DR. - HUNTINGTON CHASE HOMES CORP. TO CORY AND JENIFER PECK
$67,500- 403 PERSIMMON DR. - STACIE D. MOORE TO RICK PARKS
$119,900- 303 EDWARD ST. - JASON AND CHANTELLE STRODER TO MARK KELLER

SHILOH

$0- N. MAIN ST., SHILOH RD. - JAMES DUNN TO ST. CLAIR COUNTY
$0- N. MAIN ST., SHILOH RD. - JAMES DUNN TO ST. CLAIR COUNTY
$143,000- 34 RAMONA DR. - RACHEL AND NICOLAS MOHNKE TO NICHOLAS AND LINDSEY SHOMAKER

SMITHTON

$80,000- 415 S. SMITH ST. - SMITH WHITWORTH LLC TO BRENDA WHITWORTH

SWANSEA

$76,000- 2120 CASEYVILLE AVE. - JAN PICKEREL TO DARIUS COLEMAN
$160,000- 313 BIG BEND BLVD. - MICHAEL AND AMBER SANTANELLO TO ALEXANDRA ANDERSON AND BRITTANY MARCH

WASHINGTON PARK

$100,000- 1205 KINGSHIGHWAY - BUCKS INC. TO B&B GEMINI LLC

JANUARY 4, 2017

BELLEVILLE

$105,000- 301 RIVER LAUREL DR. - JPMORGAN CHASE BANK TO THOMAS MAY
$77,900- 4117 SHIRLEY DR. - HERC WILLIAMS TO BRUCE BORNERT

CAHOKIA

$77,800- 1312 ST. STEPHENS AND 39 W. ADAMS - JMR HOLDINGS TO HARRIS MONROE CONSULTING

CASEYVILLE

$50,000- 117 VALLEY DR. - ESTATE IF VERNA STOUT TO RACHEL RANKEN, SUSAN LEWIS AND MICHAEL LEWIS

E. ST. LOUIS

$3,950- 6813 STEVENSON DR. - JEREMY WEAVER TO EDWARD WILLS

LEBANON

$101,000- 710 CHERRY ST. - NEIL AND OLIVIA COOK TO NICHOLAS LOUGEAY

OFALLON

$88,000- 853 & 857 BRIDGEWAY DR. - H&L BUILDERS TO LF AND SON CONSTRUCTION CO.
$252,000- 841 BRIDGEWAY DR. - H&L LAND TRUST TO ERIC CALHOUN
$237,350- 477 GASTORF CT. - WAYNE BAIRD JR. AND ELIZABETH BAIRD TO KEVIN AND SHELLY ERVINE

SHILOH

$176,000- 3225 HUNTERS WAY - STEVEN SCHEARER AND CAROL CAMBLIN TO DEBORAH CRUTCHER AND MARY HUNTER

JANUARY 5, 2017

BELLEVILLE

$52,500- 1323 N. 2ND ST. - E. LECHIEN TRUSTEE TO RDS DEVELOPMENT
$155,500- 905 FOX GLENN LN. - JUDITH TRENTMANN WILSON TO ANDREW AND COURTNEY NORRIS
$25,000- 66 BETH ANN DR. - WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY TO DIANNE LYNN COUCH
$182,900- 1031 GOLFVIEW CT. - HOSPITAL SISTERS OF ST. FRANCIS USA TO GREGORY JR. AND PATRICIA WELLS
$64,500- 6023 W. A ST. - JOSH WEAVER TO BASIL BANDALAN
$49,000- 1418 RADIANCE DR. - RYAN ARNOLD TO RDS DEVELOPMENT

LEBANON

$175,000- 9928 BENDING OAKS DR. - JAMES AND AMY SPERRY TO JORDAN AND MALLORY GULBRANSON
$155,000- 122 E. MAIN ST. - CYNTHIA STENERT TO KYLE FOX AND HEATHER LANGLEY

MASCOUTAH

$15,500- 190 ST. CHRISTOPHER CT. - PLAZA DEVELOPERS TO THOMAS AND DIANA ZEISSET

MILLSTADT

$125,000- 2314 IMBS STATION RD. - BARBARA ROBERT TO GREGORY POWERS

NEW ATHENS

$10,000- 407-409 S. JACKSON - LYNN SIEGLER TO RONALD HAMPTON III

SWANSEA

$102,500- 205 BRIAN DR. - DONNA WHITNEY TO ALLAN WARD

JANUARY 6, 2017

ALORTON

$1,800- 3819 GRAND - SHERRY TILLMAN TO LUVINA SMITH

BELLEVILLE

$50,000- 21 BEYKIRCH DR. - WAYNE AND GAIL WITTER TO JUSTIN AND ABBIE AYMER
$307,000- 7729 JEFFERSON RD. - PHILLIP SHEETS TO ANDREW AND LISA HACKER

CAHOKIA

$41,500- 709 ST. BARBARA ST., 1222 RICHARD ST. - CESAR AND SYLVIA URENO TO JMR HOLDING

FREEBURG

$120,000- 4105 LEMENTON STATION RD. - KERI LAMINACK TO KERI AND JASON LAMINACK

MASCOUTAH

$50,000- LAKE DR. - KENNY LUECHTEFELD TO GEORGE AND REBECCA DOBRICK

MILLSTADT

$30,000- 6623 ROACHTOWN RD. - HEIRS OF ROBERT FIELD JR. TO TERRY HUTCHENS AND TERESA SCHARF

OFALLON

$251,271- 1013 SUNNY RIDGE CT. - MCBRIDE STONE BRIDGE TO FRANK BELL JR.

SHILOH

$35,000- 2605 BEACON POINT CT. - SD2 LLC TO FULFORD HOMES
$32,000- 849 BLUFF RIDGE LN. - SD2 LLC TO FULFORD HOMES

JANUARY 9, 2017

BELLEVILLE

$51,000- 308-310 CAMPUS - FANNIE MAE TO C&C LEGACY INVESTMENTS
$113,000- 1412 VICKSBURG - JESSIE MILLS TO RONESHA COX AND DERRICK HARVEY
$97,000- 36 MAPLE DR. - DAVID AND JUDITH FAHRNER TO STEVEN SR. AND KAREN JOUETT

CAHOKIA

$2,600- 2357 LORRAINE DR. - BETTY GORDON AND LENARD GORDON TO IRENE AND EDWARD SCHORTZ

CASEYVILLE

$30,501- 1201 HOLLYWOOD HTS. RD. - FANNIE MAE TO ERICA MARTINEZ

FREEBURG

$240,000- 102 S. MONROE ST. - MELINDA SAVITT TO KENNETH AND KRISTIN MORRIS

MARISSA

$12,924- 627 N. HAMILTON ST. - US BANK TO RICHARD DOTSON

MASCOUTAH

$875,000- RICHTER SCHOOL RD. - BETTY RENTH TO RHI ST. CLAIR REALTY
$234,070- 415 AMETHYST LN. - CNR INC TO ROBERT AND MARIANN COZZI

SHILOH

$195,000- 2241 DEER SPRINGS TR. - MICHAEL RYAN AND MICHELE TERRY TO TROY BERINGER AND HELEN MARSH

JANUARY 10, 2017

BELLEVILLE

$122,000- 1409 SALEM DR. - KERLEY PROPERTIES TO ASHLEY ROBY
$273,570- TOWN HALL RD. AND DOROTHY DR. - PATRICIA BECHERER SCHAEFER, BARBARA TITTER, RICHARD VOELLINGER, JANICE RULE AND WILLIAM VOELLINGER TO CHARLES AND RUTH AUER
$247,500- TOWN HALL RD. AND DOROTHY DR. - JANICE RULE, PATRICIA SCHAEFER, BARBARA TITTER, RICHARD VOELLINGER AND WILLIAM VOELLINGER TO SCARBROUGH HOLDINGS
$250,000- 3709 CENTREVILLE AVE. - JOHN SWISTAK JR. AND MICHAEL SWISTAK TO MATT AND JOSH FROESE
$35,211- 612 MCCLINTOCK AVE. - US BANK TO MASTERMIND INVESTING
$18,064- 217 HIGHWOOD DR. - DEUTSCHE BANK TO DEMO CONTRACTING LLC
$17,000- 14 N. 41ST ST. - THE SECRETARY OF VA TO ROBERT CAMPBELL
$57,800- 616 S. 20TH ST. - ESTATE OF CHERYL EISELE TO ZACH WEINMAN AND ASHLEY LAUTNER
$64,500- 419 SCHEEL ST. - ERIC AND KEELEY REED TO SHELLY VALENTINE

CAHOKIA

$16,500- 1318 MORNING STAR DR. - THE SECRETARY OF VA TO RIVERSIDE PROPERTY
$141,000- 401 MAIN ST. - JAMES JR. AND SUSAN KELLY TO BALWINDER AND RAJINDER SANDHU

FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS

$44,000- 33 FAIRVIEW DR. - EMPIRE TAX CORP. TO MICHAEL HORSEY

MASCOUTAH

$230,000- 1127 BEECHCRAFT - DALE AND JACLYN ARNOLD TO JOSEPH AND SANDRA WEBER

OFALLON

$48,500- 703 WESTBROOK CT. - THE SECRETARY OF VA TO MARTHA AND TIMOTHY GOULD
$86,000- 304 S. HILLGARD ST. - GREGORY, RICHARD AND LAVAONE STIKELEATHER TO STEPHEN IRVING
$60,000- 209 E. 4TH ST. - FREEDOM CONSTRUCTION AND PROPERTY MANAGEMENT TO STEVEN YOUNG
$63,550- 408 FLAGSTONE PASS DR. - RESERVES OF TIMBER RIDGE TO HUNTINGTON CHASE HOMES CORP.

JANUARY 11, 2017

BELLEVILLE

$17,000- 1072 TILLINGHAST \ 1074 TILLINGHAST - SOUTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT TO MICHAEL HAUSER
$17,500- 8806 TROON - SOUTHSIDE DEVELOPMENT TO JLP HOMES

CAHOKIA

$1,000- 2136 SANDY RIDGE RD. - JACALYN MEZO TO BRANDY SHUEMAN
$1,000- 2140 SANDY RIDGE RD. - WILEY MEZO TO BRANDY SHUEMAN

CASEYVILLE

$300,959- 179 FOREST OAKS DR. - MCBRIDE AND SON RESIDENTIAL TO KYLE AND LAURA WATSON

FAIRVIEW HEIGHTS

$54,500- 19 CONCORD DR. - JANE HOWERTON TO RDS DEVELOPMENT
$20,000- FRANK SCOTT PARKWAY EAST - CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH TO ST. CLAIR COUNTY
$20,000- 4609 BLUMBERG LN. - CHRIST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH TO ST. CLAIR COUNTY
$58,500- 4601 BLUMBERG LN. - PYRAMID INVESTMENT TO ST. CLAIR COUNTY
$143,000- 9725 GREENRIDGE HEIGHTS RD. - EDWARD AND PATRICIA DAVENPORT TO BRADLEY DAVENPORT

MARISSA

$192,500- XXX COUNTY LINE RD. - PAUL AND JEANNE MCCLEERY TO ROBERT STOCK

OFALLON

$260,000- 1457 WINCHESTER GROVE CT. - KAPPERT CONSTRUCTION TO TODD AND ARLA BENNINGTON
$98,000- 704 N. MADISON DR. - ALEX YOUNG TO BRADLEY FISH

JANUARY 12, 2017

BELLEVILLE

$182,000- 328 N. POWDER MILL RD. - TIMOTHY HIPSKIND TO ALAN AND ASHTON GUEHNE
$120,000- 746 VICKSBURG DR. - SKY BLUE DEVELOPMENT TO ALLEN SATTERFEILD
$42,500- 415 KANSAS AVE. - SOUTH ILLINOIS TRUST TO GREGORY POWERS
$28,000- 1524 SANDALWOOD DR. - SOUTH ILLINOIS TRUST TO GREGORY POWERS
$47,000- 1922 E. BELLE AVE. - SOUTH ILLINOIS TRUST TO GREGORY POWERS
$42,500- 1325 DEWEY ST. - DIANNE BLAKE TO GREGORY POWERS
$20,000- 1318 COMMERCIAL DR. - CARL ANDRES TO JOHN HIBBARD
$195,000- 35 SIGNAL HILL BLVD. - THOMAS AND MARGARET RILEY TO DAVID AND LISSA HOLLENBECK
$197,275- 2701 CEDAR GROVE DR. - MCBRIDE GREEN MOUNT MANOR TO ANDREW AND KATELYNN MCCLAIN
$77,000- 2 CARSON DR. - MATTHEW AND LANE SAMUELS TO DAVID AND KIMBERLY POTEET
$105,500- 111 DEL RIO CT. - THE SECRETARY OF VA TO WILLIAM FARIES
$160,000- 2702 BROOKRUN DR. - JOEL PEACOCK TO NICHOLAS AND CHRISTINA HALL
$40,000- 14 N. 42ND ST. - PL 2 PROPERTIES TO JONATHAN AND LISA LOESCHE

CASEYVILLE

$90,000- 357 & 359 OLD COLLINSVILLE RD. - LERCH HOMES TO LARRY AND PAMELA MIDDLETON

COLLINSVILLE

$40,000- 402 GREENWOOD PL. - TISA WINFREE TO JOSEPH GRZYWACZ III
$127,500- 1002 CHEROKEE DR. - RESOURCE CONSTRUCTION CO. TO HEARTLAND RENTAL PROPERTIES

DUPO

$349,400- XXX CHARLES YOUNG RD. - MICHAEL AND MARY YOUNG TRUST TO WEILBACHER TRUST AND MICHAEL WEILBACHER AND ROBYN WEILBACHER

FREEBURG

$147,500- 202 N. CHERRY ST. - KENNETH AND SAMANTHA KRIEG TO ERIC AND AMANDA CUMMINS

MASCOUTAH

$377,875- 9737 QUAPAW CT. - KAPPERT CONSTRUCTION TO PAUL AND SANDRA BERNARD

MILLSTADT

$255,000- 15 N. JEFFERSON - FIRST COUNTY BANK TO DSW SOLUTIONS

OFALLON

$59,750- 415 WILLOW POINT TR. - RESERVES OF TIMBER RIDGE TO HUNTINGTON CHASE HOMES CORP.

---

St. Clair County foreclosures Jan. 6-11

January 24, 2017, 8:27 am

≫ Next: Madison County asebstos motion docket Jan. 30-Feb. 3

≪ Previous: St. Clair County real estate Jan. 3-12

$

0

0

JANUARY 6, 2017

CITIZENS COMMUNITY BANK V. T. BOW INC., $512,410.91, 724 N. MADISON ST., LEBANON. 17CH12
PHH  MORTGAGE V. JASON AND TRACY MAY, $169,218.43, 4518 BARLEYRIDGE DR., SMITHTON. 17CH18

JANUARY 9, 2017

CENTRAL BANK OF ST. LOUIS V. PAUL AND RHONDA BAILEY, $61,460.45,3244 FRANK SCOTT PARKWAY WEST, BELLEVILLE. 17CH13
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON V. BLAKE AND RENEE ERTEL, $74,922.39, 111-113 N. MICHIGAN AVE., BELLEVILLE. 17CH14
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING V. HEIRS OF DOUGLAS ASHFORD, $159,369.99, 2539 COMMONS PKWY., BELLEVILLE. 17CH15
DEUTSCHE BANK V. LAURA RUDY AND  KATHRYN GREGORICH AND LARKIN MEADOW, $109,781.87, 1830 AMBROSE TERRACE DR, BELLEVILLE. 17CH16

JANUARY 10, 2017

FIRST COUNTY BANK V. HEATHER ROGERS, $46,172.68, 201 CLEARWATER DR., BELLEVILLE. 17CH20

JANUARY 11, 2017

WELLS FARGO BANK V. RAYMOND AND DELORES HAGLER , $75,504.56, 717 CENTERVILLE AVE., BELLEVILLE. 17CH21
BANK OF AMERICA V. FREDDIE WILLS AND JOI WILLS, $252,268.79, 272 LAUREN LAKE DR., BELLEVILLE. 17CH22
DEUTSCHE BANK V. KALEY MARTIN, $91,027.82, 28 SOUTH 87TH ST., BELLEVILLE. 17CH23

Madison County asebstos motion docket Jan. 30-Feb. 3

January 24, 2017, 8:39 am

≫ Next: Madison County asbestos jury docket Jan. 30

≪ Previous: St. Clair County foreclosures Jan. 6-11

$

0

0

Monday, January 30

9:00 AM

JOHNSON ROBERT T   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
15-L-001586, ASBESTOS J 327

ATKINSON RICHARD   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
16-L-000328, ASBESTOS J 327

HARRIS JOHN   V.   AII ACQUISITION CORP FKA HOLLA
16-L-000367, ASBESTOS J 327

MILLER RONALD   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-001672, ASBESTOS J 327

SHIELDS ROBERT   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000525, ASBESTOS J 327

CHARBONNEAU HECTOR E   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-000989, ASBESTOS J 327

Thursday, February 2

9:00 AM

CLUNE JILL   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
15-L-000286, ASBESTOS J 327

Friday, February 3

9:00 AM

ANDRADE ROSIE INDIVIDUALLY   V.   ACF INDUSTRIES
14-L-000888, ASBESTOS J 327

GILES HAZEL INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AGCO CORP FKA MASSEY FERGUSON
14-L-001491, ASBESTOS J 327

CALOW GLENDA JUNE INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
15-L-000297, ASBESTOS J 327

MARTIN RICHARD W   V.   AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS
15-L-000703, ASBESTOS J 327

WILKES JOHNNY JR INIDIVIDUALLY   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
15-L-000701, ASBESTOS J 327

BRAZELLE JOSEPH INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
15-L-001321, ASBESTOS J 327

RICHARDS WENDELL INDIVIDUALLY   V.   A W CHESTERTON COMPANY
15-L-001487, ASBESTOS J 327

JOHNSON ROBERT T   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
15-L-001586, ASBESTOS J 327

SMITH DANNY   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
15-L-001665, ASBESTOS J 327

DURAN WILLIAM   V.   84 LUMBER
16-L-000065, ASBESTOS J 327

PATSY ROBBINS INDIVIDUALLY   V.   ARVINMERITOR INC
16-L-000189, ASBESTOS J 327

PALHEGYI WALTER   V.   84 LUMBER COMPANY
16-L-000223, ASBESTOS J 327

PARKER WILLIAM NEIL   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
16-L-000430, ASBESTOS J 327

SNYDER STEVEN   V.   AW CHESTERTON COMPANY
16-L-000456, ASBESTOS J 327

ANDERSON STANLEY   V.   84 LUMBER
16-L-000531, ASBESTOS J 327

SLICE JOHN   V.   3M COMPANY
16-L-000767, ASBESTOS J 327

KUENZEL DONALD   V.   3M COMPANY
16-L-000843, ASBESTOS J 327

BALLARD JUDY   V.   3M COMPANY
16-L-001123, ASBESTOS J 327

USCANGA SAUL AND   V.   AII ACQUISITIONS LLC FKA AII A
16-L-001286, ASBESTOS J 327

TAYLOR RAE   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-001292, ASBESTOS J 327

GALLOWAY LINDA   V.   AFC-HOLCROFT LLC
16-L-001572, ASBESTOS J 327

BUTLER RALPH I   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
15-L-000140, ASBESTOS J 327

GARNER WILMA INDIVIDUALLY   V.   ABB INC FKA ASEA BROWN BOVERI
13-L-000324, ASBESTOS J 327

KENNEL MARTIN   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S
13-L-001032, ASBESTOS J 327

POWELL VIRGINIA INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS
13-L-002202, ASBESTOS J 327

BUDD THOMAS INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AII ACQUISITION LLC FKA AII AC
14-L-001061, ASBESTOS J 327

NOWAK JOHN   V.   ABB INC DBA ABB DE INC INDIVID
14-L-001352, ASBESTOS J 327

MIDDLETON GARALDINE   V.   ABB INC SUCC TO ITE ELECTRICAL
14-L-001432, ASBESTOS J 327

HOLTZCLAW WILLIAM   V.   ABB INC SUCC TO ITE ELECTRICAL
14-L-001509, ASBESTOS J 327

CIERO RICHARD P   V.   A SCHULMAN INC
15-L-000279, ASBESTOS J 327

THOMAS DANNY   V.   4520 CORP INC SUCCESSOR IN INT
15-L-000355, ASBESTOS J 327

HARLAN JUDITH A   V.   ABB INC SUCC TO ITE ELECTRICAL
15-L-000607, ASBESTOS J 327

TATUM JERRY   V.   ABB INC SUCC TO ITE ELECTRICAL
15-L-000792, ASBESTOS J 327

MARSH SIDNEY G   V.   AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS
15-L-000951, ASBESTOS J 327

PAJACZKOWSKI WALTER   V.   AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS
15-L-001203, ASBESTOS J 327

DESMARAIS CAROL   V.   AO SMITH CORPORATION
15-L-001295, ASBESTOS J 327

JONES THOMAS JR   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S
15-L-001648, ASBESTOS J 327

PACHMAYR WILLIAM L JR   V.   3M COMPANY
15-L-001683, ASBESTOS J 327

PIERCE WARREN   V.   AII ACQUISITIONS LLC FKA AII A
16-L-000195, ASBESTOS J 327

MILLETT WESLEY   V.   AW CHESTERTON COMPANY
16-L-000313, ASBESTOS J 327

RIFFLE JAMES   V.   AW CHESTERTON COMPANY
16-L-000324, ASBESTOS J 327

FLEENOR CHARLES D   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S
16-L-000392, ASBESTOS J 327

BUTLER BOBBY   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000461, ASBESTOS J 327

MILLER DEBRA J   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000470, ASBESTOS J 327

BENNETT ISAAC   V.   ABB INC INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SU
16-L-000623, ASBESTOS J 327

CHAMBLEE CARL E   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S
16-L-000668, ASBESTOS J 327

WARICK EMORY   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-000741, ASBESTOS J 327

HANNA ALICE   V.   4520 CORP INC SUCCESSOR IN INT
16-L-000784, ASBESTOS J 327

FOREMAN GLENN   V.   AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORA
16-L-000813, ASBESTOS J 327

HILL DENNIS   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000870, ASBESTOS J 327

COOK CHARLES   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S
16-L-000988, ASBESTOS J 327

JENSEN GARY D SR   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-001014, ASBESTOS J 327

CLOSE DONALD INDIVIDUALLY   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-001098, ASBESTOS J 327

FULTON ROBERT   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-001246, ASBESTOS J 327

BEATTY EARL T   V.   AO SMITH CORPORATION
16-L-001549, ASBESTOS J 327

ZABONICK CLARENCE   V.   ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC.
12-L-000694, ASBESTOS J 327

ANDERSON WILLIE   V.   ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC
12-L-001028, ASBESTOS J 327

HAWORTH RODNEY   V.   A O SMITH CORPORATION
12-L-001121, ASBESTOS J 327

BRITTON JAMES   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
12-L-001131, ASBESTOS J 327

BROUSSARD RANDOLPH   V.   A O SMITH CORPORATION
12-L-001139, ASBESTOS J 327

ADAMS ROBERT   V.   AUTOZONE INC
12-L-001272, ASBESTOS J 327

SHEPHERD RALEIGH   V.   84 LUMBER COMPANY
12-L-001283, ASBESTOS J 327

DEAN GLENN   V.   ARVINMERITOR INC AKA ROCKWELL
12-L-001665, ASBESTOS J 327

BARNETTE CLAUDE   V.   A O SMITH CORPORATION
12-L-001722, ASBESTOS J 327

FULTON DONALD D   V.   AFC HOLCROFT LLC
11-L-000735, ASBESTOS J 327

BROWN LONNIE   V.   AEROQUIP CORPORATION
12-L-001831, ASBESTOS J 327

CRANE WILLIAM R   V.   A W CHESTERTON CO
14-L-000966, ASBESTOS J 327

RALEIGH MARGARET INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AII ACQUISITIONS LLC FKA AII A
14-L-001369, ASBESTOS J 327

ATKINS LINDA INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
14-L-001595, ASBESTOS J 327

HARVATH VICKI   V.   ABB INC SUCC TO ITE ELECTRICAL
15-L-001164, ASBESTOS J 327

CARLSON CRAIG INDIVIDUALLY   V.   ALLETE INC SUCC TO MINNESOTA P
15-L-001176, ASBESTOS J 327

MEARA FRANK   V.   AMEREN ILLINOIS CO
15-L-000464, ASBESTOS J 327

CARACCI ROCCO   V.   AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP
15-L-000496, ASBESTOS J 327

WORSTEIN PAUL   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-000671, ASBESTOS J 327

HUMPHREY DEBORAH INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP
15-L-000387, ASBESTOS J 327

ALEXANDER WILLIAM H   V.   ABB INC SUCC TO ITE ELECTRICAL
15-L-000612, ASBESTOS J 327

BEATY ROGER   V.   ABB INC SUCC TO ITE ELECTRICAL
15-L-001198, ASBESTOS J 327

SHEPARD LUKE   V.   ABB INC SUCC TO ITE ELECTRICAL
15-L-001485, ASBESTOS J 327

ANDERSON PAUL   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-000204, ASBESTOS J 327

KRSAK JOHN   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-000468, ASBESTOS J 327

MCREYNOLDS STEVEN   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-001541, ASBESTOS J 327

MCLEAN DIANE INDIVIDUALLY   V.   FLOWSERVE US INC AS SUC TO ROC
11-L-001126, ASBESTOS J 327

LARSON WESLEY E   V.   AKZO NOBEL PAINTS LLC FKA THE
13-L-000959, ASBESTOS J 327

SEAY JACKIE N   V.   ACF INDUSTRIES LLC
12-L-001690, ASBESTOS J 327

WICHMANN CORINNE INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
13-L-001354, ASBESTOS J 327

MADER DAVID T   V.   AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS
13-L-001520, ASBESTOS J 327

WOODLON MILBURN F   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
14-L-001208, ASBESTOS J 327

WHITAKER FLOYD   V.   AII ACQUISITIONS LLC FKA AII A
15-L-000265, ASBESTOS J 327

LEWIS PARVA   V.   AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO INC
15-L-001033, ASBESTOS J 327

WEYGANDT RONALD   V.   AII ACQUISITIONS LLC FKA AII A
16-L-000172, ASBESTOS J 327

SCHUMANN JOHN   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-000901, ASBESTOS J 327

BAILEY SEAN INDIVIDUALLY   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-000929, ASBESTOS J 327

MCLEAN PATRICK INDIVIDUALLY   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-001175, ASBESTOS J 327

KAROW GERALD   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-001604, ASBESTOS J 327

PENNINGTON CARL   V.   ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC
16-L-000573, ASBESTOS J 327

HEARN GAIL INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AO SMITH CORPORATION
14-L-001000, ASBESTOS J 327

MILES JAMES L   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S
16-L-000629, ASBESTOS J 327

DENNIS LARRY   V.   ADVANCE AUTO PARTS, INC.
12-L-000724, ASBESTOS J 327

WANKE GERALD C   V.   WANKE NANCY E
12-L-000847, ASBESTOS J 327

MOLDEN CARL   V.   84 LUMBER COMPANY
12-L-001114, ASBESTOS J 327

CORNETT BURCHELL   V.   84 LUMBER COMPANY
12-L-001116, ASBESTOS J 327

KING ARCHEL   V.   BIRD, INC.;
12-L-001124, ASBESTOS J 327

SCOTT A.D.   V.   AUTOZONE WEST INC.
12-L-001240, ASBESTOS J 327

CANTY JEFFREY L   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC FKA B
12-L-001264, ASBESTOS J 327

WINGET JAMES L   V.   ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC
12-L-001304, ASBESTOS J 327

ANDERSON BILLY L   V.   ALLIED MANUFACTURING COMPANY
12-L-001568, ASBESTOS J 327

HIGGINS MARY L INDIVIDUALLY   V.   ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC
12-L-001569, ASBESTOS J 327

BRADLEY THEODORE   V.   CBS CORPORATION A DELAWARE COR
12-L-001718, ASBESTOS J 327

DENTON ROBERT F   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORP AS S
13-L-001736, ASBESTOS J 327

HENDRICK CHARLES E   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
14-L-001230, ASBESTOS J 327

BRYSON ANN INDIVIDUALLY   V.   ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC
14-L-001511, ASBESTOS J 327

SANCHEZ JOSE H   V.   AK STEEL CORPORATION
14-L-001761, ASBESTOS J 327

DOWD PETER INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AO SMITH CORPORATION
15-L-000552, ASBESTOS J 327

PEGESE MELVIN T   V.   AW CHESTERTON COMPANY
15-L-001187, ASBESTOS J 327

HUNTER JOHN M   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
15-L-001439, ASBESTOS J 327

MILLIREN MICHAEL C   V.   AW CHESTERTON COMPANY
16-L-001356, ASBESTOS J 327

RIDENOUR DALE   V.   3 M COMPANY
16-L-001535, ASBESTOS J 327

TAYLOR THOMAS AS PERS REP OF E   V.   84 LUMBER COMPANY
13-L-000879, ASBESTOS J 327

PLEASANT HAROLD   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
14-L-001147, ASBESTOS J 327

WELLS RICKY   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
14-L-001339, ASBESTOS J 327

SCHNEIDER WILLIAM D   V.   AMERICAN OPTICAL CORP
15-L-000129, ASBESTOS J 327

KITTERMAN RICHARD   V.   AH BENNETT COMPANY
15-L-001270, ASBESTOS J 327

MONTANO JAMES S   V.   AERCO INTERNATIONAL INC
15-L-001352, ASBESTOS J 327

KLEP EGGE JOHAN   V.   AW CHESTERTON COMPANY
16-L-000519, ASBESTOS J 327

MISNER EDWARD   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
16-L-000622, ASBESTOS J 327

BROWN JAMES A   V.   ADEL WIGGINS GROUP
16-L-000749, ASBESTOS J 327

HOOD, DENICO AS SPECIAL ADMINI   V.   3M COMPANY
16-L-000971, ASBESTOS J 327

Madison County asbestos jury docket Jan. 30

January 24, 2017, 8:44 am

≫ Next: Madison County civil docket Jan. 30-Feb. 3

≪ Previous: Madison County asebstos motion docket Jan. 30-Feb. 3

$

0

0

Monday, January 30

9:00 AM

CASOVIA JOHN M   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
14-L-001633, ASBESTOS JU 327

EVANS DAVID   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
14-L-001451, ASBESTOS JU 327

LANGEVIN ROBERT A   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC AS SU
15-L-001216, ASBESTOS JU 327

DAWSON JAMES I SR   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
15-L-001322, ASBESTOS JU 327

COOL ROBERT L   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-001319, ASBESTOS JU 327

LESLIE ARTHUR   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-001506, ASBESTOS JU 327

DOUGHERTY MAXINE   V.   CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION
15-L-001564, ASBESTOS JU 327

STILL RAYMOND   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
16-L-000385, ASBESTOS JU 327

BASS MAYNARD L   V.   AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORA
14-L-000722, ASBESTOS JU 327

BUCHANAN ALBERT   V.   84 LUMBER
14-L-001315, ASBESTOS JU 327

THIELE REBECCA H INDIVIDUALLY   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC AS SU
14-L-001718, ASBESTOS JU 327

WENC ANTONI   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
14-L-001745, ASBESTOS JU 327

MORGAN JAMES   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
15-L-000997, ASBESTOS JU 327

HUBBARD JOSEPH W JR   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-001495, ASBESTOS JU 327

SMITH KENNITH E   V.   BOEING COMPANY THE
15-L-001659, ASBESTOS JU 327

ATKINSON RICHARD   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
16-L-000328, ASBESTOS JU 327

WILLIAMSON ROY E SR   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000387, ASBESTOS JU 327

CLARK SHADOW   V.   AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY NKA
16-L-000464, ASBESTOS JU 327

FRITZ DONALD   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000591, ASBESTOS JU 327

MCNAMARA KENNETH   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000724, ASBESTOS JU 327

WATKINS JERRY   V.   AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATI
16-L-000237, ASBESTOS JU 327

ENGELMAN ROSALIE INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AFC HOLCROFT LLC
15-L-000128, ASBESTOS JU 327

ROBINSON ALLAN N   V.   ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP
15-L-001241, ASBESTOS JU 327

PENNINGTON CARL   V.   ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC
16-L-000573, ASBESTOS JU 327

SANDERS JAMES   V.   AMERON INTERNATIONAL CORPORATI
16-L-000742, ASBESTOS JU 327

DELONG GERALD   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000205, ASBESTOS JU 327

HARRIS JOHN   V.   AII ACQUISITION CORP FKA HOLLA
16-L-000367, ASBESTOS JU 327

PAUL JIMMY   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC AS SU
16-L-000603, ASBESTOS JU 327

HAYES ALTA INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
14-L-000952, ASBESTOS JU 327

NICKLES MARK INDIVIDUALLY   V.   CERTAIN TEED CORPORATION
14-L-001645, ASBESTOS JU 327

JOSE DANILO   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
14-L-001744, ASBESTOS JU 327

ANDERSON LAURIE A INDIVIDUALLY   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
14-L-001760, ASBESTOS JU 327

HEFFELFINGER MADELEINE A INDIV   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC AS SU
15-L-000010, ASBESTOS JU 327

ANDERSON RICHARD E JR   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC AS SU
15-L-000038, ASBESTOS JU 327

WISE BEVERLY INDIVIDUALLY   V.   ARVINMERITOR INC
15-L-000198, ASBESTOS JU 327

FRADY PATSY   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-000335, ASBESTOS JU 327

MAXWELL OLIVER H INDIVIDUALLY   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-000438, ASBESTOS JU 327

GRISSETT CARLTON   V.   ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED
15-L-000752, ASBESTOS JU 327

BLOHM SHIRLEY M   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-000851, ASBESTOS JU 327

MUNOZ ISABEL   V.   ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED
15-L-000873, ASBESTOS JU 327

BIXBY MARGARET   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-001061, ASBESTOS JU 327

DERKS FORREST   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC AS SU
15-L-001113, ASBESTOS JU 327

CARLTON RACHEL   V.   ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED
15-L-001191, ASBESTOS JU 327

ROOKS ARVIN   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
15-L-001204, ASBESTOS JU 327

KLESSINGER JOSEPH   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-001634, ASBESTOS JU 327

MILLER RONALD   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-001672, ASBESTOS JU 327

GOMEZ MIGUEL R   V.   CERTAIN-TEED CORPORATION
16-L-000008, ASBESTOS JU 327

LENARZ JOSEPH   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000041, ASBESTOS JU 327

ECKERT SHIRLEY M INDIVIDUALLY   V.   ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL INC
16-L-000046, ASBESTOS JU 327

ANGEL SANDRA   V.   ABP INDUCTION LLC SUCCESSOR IN
16-L-000047, ASBESTOS JU 327

OOMEN MICHEAL   V.   AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION
16-L-000081, ASBESTOS JU 327

PUSTOLA PETER   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC AS SU
16-L-000089, ASBESTOS JU 327

KIEFFER ARTHUR   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000093, ASBESTOS JU 327

AMLING ROBERT   V.   BURNHAM LLC
16-L-000111, ASBESTOS JU 327

KUST JOHN E SR   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000148, ASBESTOS JU 327

GILLEY DEAN B   V.   ALMA PISTON COMPANY
16-L-000156, ASBESTOS JU 327

KASPER LAWRENCE J   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000157, ASBESTOS JU 327

BAILEY MARION L   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000197, ASBESTOS JU 327

CAMMELOT MARLENE   V.   ARVINMERITOR INC
16-L-000240, ASBESTOS JU 327

TERRY DEAN   V.   ARVINMERITOR INC
16-L-000241, ASBESTOS JU 327

BARKLY RAYMOND   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
16-L-000254, ASBESTOS JU 327

HOLBROOK JAMES   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000274, ASBESTOS JU 327

KESSINGER OLIVER   V.   AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION
16-L-000314, ASBESTOS JU 327

WISE ERNEST   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000320, ASBESTOS JU 327

EDWARDS DONALD   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
16-L-000325, ASBESTOS JU 327

MONCRIEF RONALD   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
16-L-000332, ASBESTOS JU 327

KRAEMER ROBERT   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000451, ASBESTOS JU 327

KUNZ JOHN   V.   AJAX MAGNETHERMIC CORPORATION
16-L-000465, ASBESTOS JU 327

SHIELDS ROBERT   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000525, ASBESTOS JU 327

LIPE BETTY   V.   ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED
16-L-000695, ASBESTOS JU 327

TRAVERSE GARY   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
16-L-000746, ASBESTOS JU 327

ROWLEY MELVIN H   V.   CALAVERAS ASBESTOS LTD
15-L-001213, ASBESTOS JU 327

BAKER RICK J INDIVIDUALLY   V.   A W CHESTERTON COMPANY
13-L-000283, ASBESTOS JU 327

MAY DENNIS D   V.   AGCO CORPORATION
13-L-001898, ASBESTOS JU 327

VOLRATH SUSAN JOANN INDIVIDUAL   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
13-L-001927, ASBESTOS JU 327

SMITH JOHNNY INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION
14-L-000013, ASBESTOS JU 327

MAYFIELD BONNIE INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
14-L-000438, ASBESTOS JU 327

HOLLAND SUE INDIVIDUALLY   V.   ARVINMERITOR INC IND AND AS SU
14-L-000924, ASBESTOS JU 327

CASTELLON CECILLE INDIVIDUALLY   V.   AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORA
14-L-000937, ASBESTOS JU 327

SABO NORMAN   V.   ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED
14-L-001210, ASBESTOS JU 327

BREAZEALE KENNETH E   V.   AIR LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION
14-L-001697, ASBESTOS JU 327

GUTHRIE BILLY R   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-000617, ASBESTOS JU 327

WISE JESSIE   V.   AIR LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION
15-L-000690, ASBESTOS JU 327

JORDAN MARTHA INDIVIDUALLY   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC AS SU
15-L-000782, ASBESTOS JU 327

CHARBONNEAU HECTOR E   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
15-L-000989, ASBESTOS JU 327

COLELLA LARRY   V.   ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC
15-L-001196, ASBESTOS JU 327

DIVIRGILIO SYLVANA J   V.   GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC
15-L-001297, ASBESTOS JU 327

BROWN DAVID F   V.   ALBANY INTERNATIONAL CORP
15-L-001305, ASBESTOS JU 327

ROBERTS ERNEST   V.   ANCO INSULATIONS, INC.
15-L-001355, ASBESTOS JU 327

LOCHTEFELD LOUELLA   V.   ASBESTOS CORPORATION LIMITED
16-L-000687, ASBESTOS JU 327

LYON SANDRA INDIVIDUALLY   V.   LYON SANDRA AS EXEC FOR THE ES
14-L-001015, ASBESTOS JU 327

LISTON PETE INDIVIDUALLY   V.   LISTON KEITH R
14-L-001238, ASBESTOS JU 327

BRUSKAS JAMES L   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC AS SU
15-L-001314, ASBESTOS JU 327

CROUCH AUDREY   V.   CBS CORPORATION A DELEWARE COR
15-L-001394, ASBESTOS JU 327

MARTIN LUKE   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC INC AS SU
15-L-001408, ASBESTOS JU 327

STORM ROBERT   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC AS SU
15-L-001455, ASBESTOS JU 327

BURMEISTER JOHN P   V.   AMERICAN BILTRITE INC
15-L-000398, ASBESTOS JU 327

MORALES DENNIS J   V.   AIR LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION
15-L-000978, ASBESTOS JU 327

DEGROFF RONALD W   V.   ARVINMERITOR INC
15-L-001172, ASBESTOS JU 327

MACE DONALD D   V.   AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATI
14-L-000616, ASBESTOS JU 327

ANDERSON ROBERT W   V.   3M COMPANY FKA MINNESOTA MININ
14-L-001415, ASBESTOS JU 327

CLYMER LARRY J   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC AS SU
15-L-000770, ASBESTOS JU 327

HAYES ROBERT E   V.   CBS CORPORATION A DELAWARE COR
15-L-000815, ASBESTOS JU 327

PHILLIPS LAWRENCE W SR   V.   ARVINMERITOR INC
15-L-001004, ASBESTOS JU 327

JAMESON HERMAN E   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC AS SU
15-L-001234, ASBESTOS JU 327

VANN JERRY A   V.   ARVINMERITOR INC
15-L-001238, ASBESTOS JU 327

HARDING THOMAS H II   V.   CBS CORPORATION A DELEWARE COR
15-L-001499, ASBESTOS JU 327

FRANZ JOSEF   V.   BORGWARNER MORSE TEC LLC AS SU
15-L-001555, ASBESTOS JU 327

Madison County civil docket Jan. 30-Feb. 3

January 24, 2017, 8:50 am

≫ Next: Construction company sues contractors for alleged breach of contract

≪ Previous: Madison County asbestos jury docket Jan. 30

$

0

0

Monday, January 30

9:00 AM

THOMPSON JOHN W  V.  COTTRELL INC
09-L-001067, MUDGE 302

ATKINSON CRAIG A  V.  POLZIN NANCY J
13-L-001497, MATOESIAN 351

BIXLER GREGORY  V.  NICKALLY CORPORATION DBA NICKS
14-L-001038, RUTH 311

WALLENDORF LAURA AS SPEC ADM O  V.  ST ANTHONYS PHYSICIAN GROUP
14-L-000060, MUDGE 302

MORSTAIN ELIZABETH  V.  COLLINS CLUB INC
14-L-001767, RUTH 311

SLAYDEN KATLYN  V.  PAPPA JOHNS PIZZA
14-L-001768, MATOESIAN 351

MILLER HUBBARD  V.  STEARNS PROPERTY COMPANY LLC D
12-L-000579, MATOESIAN 351

Tuesday, January 31

1:30 PM

CACH LLC  V.  SIMON MICHAEL
16-L-000220, CROWDER 320

Wednesday, February 1

9:00 AM

MILLER KELLY IND & AS ADMIN OF  V.  REESE CONSTRUCTION CO A
00-L-001178, STOBBS 327

Friday, February 3

9:00 AM

PENCE CHARLES W  V.  WEBER BRENNAN D
15-L-001444, HYLLA 230

ELLIOTT PAMELA J  V.  LUTTINEN BRIAN
15-L-001048, HYLLA 230

Construction company sues contractors for alleged breach of contract

January 24, 2017, 9:04 am

≫ Next: Woman alleges mother died from sepsis in nursing home

≪ Previous: Madison County civil docket Jan. 30-Feb. 3

$

0

0

EDWARDSVILLE — A construction company is suing contractors for allegedly failing to make payments.

Lumberyard Suppliers Inc., doing business as LS Building Products filed a complaint on Jan. 11, in the Madison County Circuit Court against AMP Construction & Restoration LLC and John Michael Settlemyer, alleging they failed to fulfill their obligations under the terms of the promissory note.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that on April 14, 2016, in exchange for goods and valuable considerations, the defendants executed a promissory note in favor of Lumberyard Suppliers in the amount of $235,000. As of Jan. 5, 2017, the balance of $99,995.37 remains due and owing.

The plaintiff alleges the defendants failed and refused to make payments for the said balance account.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks judgment against defendants, jointly and severally, in the sum of $99,995.37, plus interest, attorney's fees and costs of this suit.

It is represented by Mark M. Silvermintz of Law Office of Mark M. Silvermintz in Collinsville.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 17-L-46

Woman alleges mother died from sepsis in nursing home

January 24, 2017, 9:15 am

≫ Next: Property owner alleges bar and grill operators damaged property

≪ Previous: Construction company sues contractors for alleged breach of contract

$

0

0

EDWARDSVILLE — A surviving daughter is suing a nursing home and care providers after her mother allegedly died due to complications from decubitus ulcers.

Debra King, as special representative of the estate of Barbara Wooley, deceased, filed a complaint on Jan. 11 in the Madison County Circuit Court against Willow Rose Rehab & Health Care Center, Healogics Inc. and Accellecare Wound Professionals LLC, alleging they violated the Illinois Nursing Home Care Act and the Illinois Wrongful Death Act.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that on Jan. 5, 2016, Wooley died due to complications associated with decubitus ulcers, which caused sepsis in her bloodstream.

The plaintiff alleges that during the last six months of Wooley's residency at the defendants' facility, they allegedly failed to provide necessary and appropriate treatment and services and failed to protect Wooley from abuse and neglect.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks judgement against defendants in an amount exceeding the jurisdictional limits of the court, attorney's fees and costs and all other relief that the court deems just and equitable.

She is represented by Paul V. Johnson of SL Chapman LLC in St. Louis.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 17-L-42

Property owner alleges bar and grill operators damaged property

January 24, 2017, 9:36 am

≫ Next: Edwardsville attorneys sued for alleged legal malpractice

≪ Previous: Woman alleges mother died from sepsis in nursing home

$

0

0

EDWARDSVILLE — A property owner is suing bar and grill operators for allegedly damaging the property and failing to pay for repairs. 

Noreen Faye Kelsey filed a complaint on Jan. 17 in the Madison County Circuit Court against Louise E. Benham, Stephanie L. Benham and 2001 Hildebrand Inc., alleging they failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the promissory note.

According to the complaint, Kelsey claims the defendants operate a bar and grill and allegedly damaged the property.

As a result, Kelsey alleges she had to expend time and money repairing the damages and has not received the full payment of $61,200 for the repairs.

The plaintiff alleges the defendants failed and refused, and continue to fail and refuse, to tender payments and misused and altered plaintiff's property.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks judgment against defendants in excess of $50,000 for each of them, attorney's fees, interest and costs of this suit.

She is represented by Andrew G. Toennies and Rodney D. Fourez of Lashly & Baer PC in St. Louis.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 17-L-29

---

Edwardsville attorneys sued for alleged legal malpractice

January 24, 2017, 9:50 am

≫ Next: Motorist, vehicle owner sued following collision

≪ Previous: Property owner alleges bar and grill operators damaged property

$

0

0

EDWARDSVILLE — A client is suing Edwardsville attorneys Amanda Bradley Verett and Michael E. Reid for alleged legal malpractice.

Christopher Nolan filed a complaint on Jan. 17 in the Madison County Circuit Court against Amanda Bradley Verett and Michael E. Reid, alleging they deviated from the standard of care of a reasonable attorney.

According to the complaint, Nolan alleges he was charged $18,569.03 by the defendants without receiving benefits and was assessed $25,000 in attorney's fees as a result of their breach of contract.

The plaintiff alleges the defendants failed to follow the Illinois Rules of Professional Responsibility.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks judgment against defendants in excess of $50,000 for each of them, plus costs of this suit.

He is represented by Thomas E. Hildebrand of Thomas E. Hildebrand Law Office in Granite City.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 17-L-27

Motorist, vehicle owner sued following collision

January 24, 2017, 9:58 am

≫ Next: Duebbert search warrants moved quickly to public record in St. Clair County

≪ Previous: Edwardsville attorneys sued for alleged legal malpractice

$

0

0

EDWARDSVILLE — A motorist is suing another driver and the vehicle's owner for allegedly causing a collision.

Cory Rice filed a complaint on Jan. 12 in the Madison County Circuit Court against Diana Foster, Mollie Palmer and Dustin Freytag, alleging Palmer negligently entrusted her vehicle to an unlicensed and careless driver.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that on Jan. 12, 2015, he was operating a 2004 Lincoln LS and was stopped at traffic in the southbound lane of Stanley Road at its intersection with Illinois Rt. 111. At the same time, Foster approached the intersection and negligently collided with the driver's side of plaintiff's vehicle, the suit states.

As a result, Rice claims he sustained severe and permanent injuries, loss of income and medical expenses.

The plaintiff alleges Foster and Freytag failed to operate the vehicle they were driving in a safe manner and failed to maintain careful lookout.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks judgment against each defendant for $50,000, pre-judgment interest, costs of this suit and all other relief as the court deems just and appropriate.

He is represented by Michael R. Wesley of The Law Office of Michael R. Wesley LLC in Wood River.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 17-L-28

Duebbert search warrants moved quickly to public record in St. Clair County

January 24, 2017, 12:44 pm

≫ Next: Belleville attorney seeks to dismiss doctor's malpractice suit

≪ Previous: Motorist, vehicle owner sued following collision

$

0

0

Among 39 St. Clair County search warrants that changed from confidential to public record between Dec. 20 and Jan. 17, two that pertained to Circuit Judge Ron Duebbert changed the quickest.

And on the day a court clerk stamped those two as open records on Jan. 12, the contents of Duebbert’s warrants were the subject of a local news article at 5:25 p.m.

While Duebbert has not been charged criminally, a special prosecutor has been called to investigate whether the newly elected judge obstructed an investigation into the murder of Carl Silas, who was shot in the face with a long gun at an apartment on West Boulevard in Belleville before dawn on Dec. 30.

On that date, sheriff’s deputies took suspect David Fields into custody.

Fields had spent time in prison and, upon release, had stayed at Duebbert’s Belleville home.

Duebbert, a Republican, defeated incumbent Democrat judge John Baricevic in the Nov. 8 election, and was sworn into office Dec. 5.

Controversy related to Fields has overshadowed Duebbert’s tenure as judge from the beginning.

Chief Judge Andrew Gleeson assigned Duebbert to hear traffic cases and specifically not first appearance felony cases that typically would go through his assigned courtroom. Gleeson indicated that Duebbert’s sheltering of a parolee listed as a violent offender gave the appearance of impropriety.

On New Year’s Eve, sheriff’s investigator Justin Biggs applied for warrants to search Duebbert’s phone and Sprint’s records for it.

In one of the warrants, Biggs wrote that witnesses identified Fields as the shooter and that one of them provided his phone number.

Biggs wrote that Sprint identified the account subscriber as Ronald Duebbert.

According to the warrant, Duebbert told investigators he met with Fields on Dec. 29, around 8 p.m., and that he had no further contact with Fields.

However, Biggs wrote that a request to Sprint provided nine text details between their phones on Dec. 29, from 8:10 p.m. to 10:47 p.m.

He wrote that special agent Patrick McGuire took custody of Duebbert’s phone.

Associate judge Stephen Rice signed the warrants around 6 p.m. on Dec. 31.

At 7:11 p.m., Biggs wrote, “Warrant served by fax, return of records pending.”

On Jan. 3, State’s Attorney Brendan Kelly charged Fields with first degree murder.

Gleeson set bail at $2 million.

On Jan. 4, Kelly requested appointment of a special prosecutor for Duebbert.

On Jan. 7, Kelly sent the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board “documentation containing allegations of violations of the Illinois code of judicial conduct.”

“Specifically, Judge Duebbert allegedly did not uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary,” Kelly wrote.

Kelly mixed the murder with last year’s election, alleging that candidate Duebbert did not maintain the dignity appropriate to judicial office.

He wrote that Duebbert’s conduct included the use of a racial epithet.

Kelly wrote that he filed an identical report with the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.

The phone records that investigator Biggs sought from Sprint arrived on Jan. 9. Although search warrants normally stay with one judge, Gleeson took charge of the warrants Rice had signed.

Gleeson signed a return at 4:27 p.m.

“Warrant was also sent to lawyer on 01-01-17 6:30 p.m.,” Gleeson wrote.

“Confirmation was received on 01-03-17 9:30 a.m.”

Biggs never returned the warrant for Duebbert’s phone.

On Jan. 12, an envelope full of warrants moved from Kelly’s office on the second floor of the courthouse to Circuit Clerk Kahalah Clay’s office on the third floor.

It contained the pair of warrants for Duebbert’s phone, a similar pair for Silas’s phone, and four warrants from separate cases.

The contents of Duebbert’s warrants were the subject of a news article at 5:25 p.m.

No other warrant that the clerk received from Dec. 20 to Jan. 17, entered the public record at such high speed.

A warrant on Scott Credit Union reached the clerk 12 days after execution.

A warrant on First Western Inn in Caseyville reached the clerk in 13 days.

Warrants on Sprint in other cases reached the clerk in 15, 62, and 68 days.

Four other warrants on phone providers in a single case reached the clerk in 21 days, and four in another case reached the clerk in 68 to 71 days.

Other warrants:

-For a drug search reached the clerk in 21 days.

-On Snapchat reached the clerk in 33 days.

-On a stolen vehicle in Washington State reached the clerk in 60 days.

-On child pornography reached the clerk in 67 days.

-On a laptop reached the clerk in 90 days.

About half the warrants expired without anyone executing and returning them.

Searching for search warrants

Anyone searching for a particular warrant at the St. Clair County Courthouse needs help finding it, for three reasons.

-First, the envelope that holds the warrant doesn’t identify the suspect.

-Second, no regular schedule governs the movement of a warrant from the investigator to the state’s attorney, or from that office to the circuit clerk. One of the 39 warrants that became public record between Dec. 20 and Jan. 17 reached the clerk after five years, another after 11 months.

-Third, warrants don’t appear in the public record of any ensuing criminal case.

Belleville attorney seeks to dismiss doctor's malpractice suit

January 24, 2017, 2:00 pm

≫ Next: Gleeson grants default judgment in suit alleging sex assault

≪ Previous: Duebbert search warrants moved quickly to public record in St. Clair County

$

0

0

Belleville attorney Terry Brown seeks to dismiss a physician’s legal malpractice suit alleging a Jefferson County jury ruled against the doctor after he was advised not to settle a wrongful death suit.

Dr. Manoj Desai, a Mt. Vernon urologist alleges he was a defendant in a 2011 wrongful death lawsuit, in which a jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Marie Clayton, awarding her $3.75 million (11-L-66). Clayton filed her wrongful death suit on behalf of decedent Robert Clayton.

In his legal malpractice suit, Desai claims Clayton offered to settle the case within the policy limits of the liability insurance maintained by Desai.

Desai hired Brown to advise him on how to respond to Clayton’s settlement demand and to advise his insurance carrier to settle the case in order to avoid exposing his personal assets. Desai claims Brown told him it was in his best interest not to settle the Clayton case.

However, a jury later ruled in favor of Clayton and awarded her $3.75 million, which was $2.5 million more than the liability limits maintained by Desai’s insurance.

As a result of the jury verdict, Desai alleges his personal assets are at risk.

Desai alleges Brown failed to investigate the wrongful death claim, failed to advise him to settle the case and failed to monitor the progress of the case.

Brown filed a combined motion to dismiss on Dec. 7 through attorneys Daniel Konicek and Thomas Long of Konicek & Dillon PC in Geneva, Ill.

Brown argues that a legal malpractice claim cannot be assigned by a client to a non-client, third party.

He explains that Desai initially assigned the majority of his legal malpractice claim to Clayton.

“Therefore, Desai no longer possesses the legal right on which his claim against Brown is based. That being the case, he does not have legal standing to pursue the cause of action contained in his complaint. Moreover, given the fact that the assignment of legal malpractice claims is prohibited, the instant action cannot be pursued by Clayton or by Desai for the benefit of Clayton,” the motion states.

Brown also alleges that Desai would have to establish that had the defendant send a “demand letter,” ISMIE would have settled the case prior to trial in order to properly plead a “but for” claim.

Desai responded to Brown’s motion to dismiss on Dec. 27 through attorney Michael Gras of the Law Office of Christoher Cueto in Belleville.

The plaintiff argues that the defendant’s motion presents questions of fact that are not yet ripe, as the case is only at the pleading stage of the proceedings.

Desai also argues that he does not have to plead that had Brown complied with the duty he owed the plaintiff, ISMIE would have paid the underlying claim.

“Dr. Desai’s damages from Mr. Brown’s failure to comply with the relevant standard of care exist whether or not ISMIE would, or would not, have listened to the request to settle,” the response states. “By not sending such a letter or failing to do what he said he would, Terry Brown harmed Dr. Desai in that when the excess verdict inevitably arrived, Dr. Desai’s personal assets were at risk.

“Had Terry Brown did what he was supposed to do, and ISMIE still refused to settle, Dr. Desai would have had an action against ISMIE for failure to protect him.

“Because of Mr. Brown’s negligence so much of what Dr. Desai had worked his entire professional career was now at risk of loss. His plans for a retirement were at risk. Ultimately, Dr. Desai had to pay personally to avoid the predicament Mr. Brown put him in.”

A hearing is set for Feb. 21 at 9 a.m. with Circuit Judge Vincent Lopinot.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 16-L-387

Gleeson grants default judgment in suit alleging sex assault

January 24, 2017, 2:09 pm

≫ Next: Madison County school boards pave way for sales tax referendum on April 4 ballot

≪ Previous: Belleville attorney seeks to dismiss doctor's malpractice suit

$

0

0

St. Clair County Circuit Judge Andrew Gleeson granted default judgment in a suit alleging a disabled adult was sexually assaulted.

Gleeson granted default on Dec. 6, awarding the plaintiff judgment for counts I and II. A hearing will be held at a later date to determine damages.

Plaintiff Chinetta Martin, individually and as guardian of the estate of C.D.C., a disabled adult, filed a motion for default judgment on Sept. 9. She argues that defendant Makial Lucas failed to file a responsive pleading, entitling her to default judgment.

Martin filed her complaint on May 25 against Lucas and Samuel Young III.

Martin claims C.D.C. was sexually assaulted in her school on Dec. 16, 2013, which was allegedly proven with a rape examination.

She alleges the experience caused C.D.C. to suffer severe trauma. She has also stopped going to school, leaving her unable to complete her high school education, the suit states.

Martin alleges the defendants removed C.D.C. from her class and forcefully dragged her into a closet to sexually abuse her.

She seeks a judgment of more than $50,000, punitive damages, plus court costs.

Young answered the complaint on June 27, denying the allegations against him.

Young is representing himself pro se.

The plaintiff is represented by Ryan Mahoney of Cates Mahoney in Swansea.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 16-L-287

Madison County school boards pave way for sales tax referendum on April 4 ballot

January 24, 2017, 2:13 pm

≫ Next: Next talc-cancer case scheduled in St. Louis Feb. 6; Trial set after J&J loses jurisdictional appeal

≪ Previous: Gleeson grants default judgment in suit alleging sex assault

$

0

0

Madison County voters will decide a proposed sales tax increase in the April 4 election that proponents say will give schools more revenue to pay for school construction costs if it passes. 
Regional Superintendent of Schools Robert Daiber said districts that recently passed resolutions were Roxana, Triad, Highland, Bethalto, Granite City, Alton, Madison and East Alton districts 13 and 14.
“Sixty-three point five percent of the student population’s districts passed resolutions to put it on the ballot,” Daiber said.
County Clerk Mark von Nida has until Jan. 26 to certify the question to appear on the ballot.
“Most likely yes, it is going to be on the ballot,” Daiber said. 
He also said that Wood River Hartford District 15 will be passing the resolution despite not having done so before a Jan. 17 deadline. Only Collinsville voted the resolution down 4-2. Edwardsville and Venice school districts did not vote on the issue.
“They have done what they needed to do to submit it,” Daiber said of the districts. “I would highly encourage them, if they want it to pass, to campaign.”
The proposed 1 percent sales tax would be imposed on consumer goods, many of which are purchased by those outside the county, Daiber earlier told the Record.
“A good percentage of revenue that is generated from this is not paid by Madison County taxpayers," he said. "It is paid for by individuals passing through that may be buying things at interstate marts."
A proposed sales tax increase was overwhelmingly rejected by voters in Madison County in 2011, but Daiber said he believed things may be different this year.
“I think that maybe there is a more sincere need for it, maybe viewed by the public because of the current issues and funding education by the state," he said.
“I think the general public is aware of the issues of funding of education because of the amount of media attention that has been given to it,” he said, adding that he was aware of the concern over property taxes.
“This is a source of revenue that could lower property taxes.”
Daiber also noted that six new schools had just opened in 2011, which may have led residents to believe there was no need of a sales tax.
“Unfortunately to those districts who didn’t have bond issues that were successful for construction they are in greater need right now for facility maintenance,” he said.
However, Madison County Board Chairman Kurt Prenzler has made it clear that he is against the tax in a post on his social media site in which he discussed how the referendum to lower the tax levy for the Madison County government “was approved by the voters by a margin of 4 to 1.”
“The Democrats and AFSCME government employees' union challenged the petitions, but we survived the challenge, because we simply had the necessary signatures,” Prenzler wrote.
Prenzler said that the "real" reason for the proposed sales tax increase was to create a new stream of taxes, between $20-23 million per year. He said that would allow investment bankers to issue more than $300 million of bonds, which would put taxpayers "deep in long term debt."
Yet, Daiber said that things are much different on the financial front for the county.
“There has been an almost $2 million growth in sales tax revenue from 2011 when the initiative was put forth to today,” he said.

Next talc-cancer case scheduled in St. Louis Feb. 6; Trial set after J&J loses jurisdictional appeal

January 24, 2017, 2:21 pm

≫ Next: Sears denies liability in mechanic's wrongful termination suit

≪ Previous: Madison County school boards pave way for sales tax referendum on April 4 ballot

$

0

0

ST. LOUIS – The latest lawsuit in the nation's controversial talc-related litigation center is set to begin in St. Louis next month with more than 60 women and family members seeking damages against New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson.

Swann vs Johnson & Johnson et. al., which combines the claims of mostly non-residents of Missouri, is expected to begin Feb. 6 before Judge Rex Burlison in Missouri's 22nd Judicial Circuit Court at the Carnahan Courthouse in St. Louis.

The trial date was set after Johnson & Johnson attorneys failed to get an appeals court to deny jurisdiction in the case for the 22nd Circuit Court to hear cases of out-of-state plaintiffs. Most of the plaintiffs with claims against Johnson & Johnson in Missouri courts are not residents of the state.

On Jan. 3, Chief Judge Angela T. Quigless issued a one-page order denying Johnson & Johnson's jurisdictional appeal.

Over the last few years, St. Louis Circuit Court has become known for being plaintiff-friendly, as seen by an increase in product liability and asbestos litigation. In a Sept. 29 article, Bloomberg Business referred to St. Louis as the "New Hot Spot for Litigation Tourists" with "a reputation for fast trials, favorable rulings, and big awards."

St. Louis was identified as a “judicial hellhole” by the American Tort Reform Association in its most recent report of the same name, saying St. Louis is very attractive to out-of-state plaintiffs for Missouri's lax standard for expert testimony and laws that allow for ease of forum shopping.

Things could change given the recent election of Missouri Governor Eric Greitens, who mentioned the dubious 'hellhole' distinction in his first State of the State address. Greitens is a strong supporter of tort reform, including advocating for the adoption of the more exacting Daubert standard for expert evidence and an end to "junk science" lawsuits.

Litigating the link between talc and ovarian cancer

Talc cases have become so lucrative, that Mass Torts Made Perfect conference in October, in the Bellagio Hotel Grand Ballroom in Las Vegas, offered tips for plaintiff and venue selection for the most friendly courts and the highest awards.

"The epidemiology is already there," James B. Matthews III, an attorney with Blasingame Burch Garrard & Ashley in Athens, Ga., told trial lawyers attending the conference. "You have to work to prove specific causation in these cases. You have to get the pathology, then you have to have good experts to explain these things. You need to be able to find the talc in the cells on the pathology slides but you've got to have somebody who can explain what that means."

A St. Louis Record request to Johnson & Johnson seeking comment was not answered. However, a page on the company's website maintains that talc is accepted as safe for use in cosmetic and personal care products by the European Union, Canada and many other countries, including Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Israel, South Africa, Turkey and Indonesia.

The website also points out that talc in consumer products has been asbestos-free since the 1970s and that Johnson & Johnson's baby powder products contain only U.S. Pharmacopeia grade talc. "The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which identifies potential risk factors for many diseases, has not identified talc as a risk factor for ovarian cancer," the website says.

Johnson & Johnson also cites two widely accepted studies, Harvard School of Public Health's "Nurses’ Health Study", published in 2009, and the U.S. National Institutes of Health's Women’s Health Initiative Observational Cohort, published in 2014. Both found no association between talc and ovarian cancer.

The latest data available, published in 2015 by the independent Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel, referred to talc as "safe in the present practices of use and concentration described in this safety assessment.”
 
Last summer, and outside counsel for Johnson & Johnson said there were strong grounds for appeals against multimillion-dollar jury verdicts linking talcum powder and ovarian cancer.

However, those scientific findings have not been able to counter opposite findings claimed by plaintiffs' attorneys in various legal venues. In 2015, juries in St. Louis handed down separate verdicts against Johnson & Johnson of $55 million, $70 million and $72 million respectively. Johnson & Johnson faces hundreds of similar lawsuits and the pressure is great to settle those lawsuits rather than use science to defend itself in court.

---

Sears denies liability in mechanic's wrongful termination suit

January 24, 2017, 2:23 pm

≫ Next: Construction company alleges Ameren was negligent in wrongful death suit

≪ Previous: Next talc-cancer case scheduled in St. Louis Feb. 6; Trial set after J&J loses jurisdictional appeal

$

0

0

Sears denies liability in a mechanic’s suit alleging he was wrongfully accused of stealing by a co-worker in order to cover the defendant’s own thefts.

Karlo Matanzo filed the complaint on Oct. 4 against Sears Holding Corporation, doing business as Sears Auto Center, and Christopher Boone.

However, Sears Holdings Corporation was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice, and Sears Roebuck and Co. was substituted in as defendant.

Sears Holdings Corporation filed a stipulation for dismissal on Nov. 30 through attorney Misty Martin of Seyfarth Shaw LLP in Chicago.

It argued that the correct legal entity that employed the plaintiff and Bone is Sears, Roebuck and Co.

Associate Judge Christopher Kolker granted dismissal and substitution on Dec. 5.

According to the complaint, Matanzo alleges that in September 2015, he was terminated from his employment with Sears Auto Center after Boone allegedly fabricated accusations” that the plaintiff was stealing from the company. Matanzo alleges Boone made the false accusations to cover his own thefts from the company.

Sears Roebuck and Bone answered the complaint on Dec. 12.

They filed 14 affirmative defenses, arguing that there was no unprivileged publication to a third person, barring Matanzo’s defamation claim, and that any alleged defamatory statement “may reasonably be innocently interpreted.”

They argue that a corporate employer cannot interfere with its own business relationship with its employees.

The defendants also argue that the plaintiff was an at-will employee and could be terminated at any time for no cause at all.

Sears also claims that any alleged unlawful manner would have been outside of the course and scope of the individual’s employment and would not have been authorized or condoned by Sears.

A status conference is set for Jan. 30 at 9 a.m.

Matanzo is represented by Thomas Maag of the Maag Law Firm LLC in Wood River.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 16-L-529

Construction company alleges Ameren was negligent in wrongful death suit

January 24, 2017, 2:47 pm

≫ Next: --- Article Removed ---

≪ Previous: Sears denies liability in mechanic's wrongful termination suit

$

0

0

A construction company argues that Ameren Illinois was negligent when it installed a gas pipeline that allegedly exploded when an employee dug too deep, resulting in his death.

Angela Behme, as special administrator of the estate of John Douglas Behme, filed the lawsuit on June 20 against Ameren Illinois Company, A.B. Construction & Development LLC, doing business as Keystone Construction & Development, Sheppard Morgan & Schwaab Inc., doing business as SMS Engineers, and Villas of Nottingham.

Behme alleges the decedent was employed with Keller Construction on a Villas of Nottingham project in Maryville on April 6. He was operating the excavating equipment when he allegedly struck an underground gas pipeline owned and operated by Ameren. The pipeline ruptured and exploded, resulting in Behme’s death.

The plaintiff claims the defendants failed to monitor the gas pipeline for appropriate depth and the line’s integrity, failed to provide the actual location of the pipeline and failed to monitor the gas pipeline during construction and excavation in the area.

Third-party defendant Keller Construction answered the complaint on Dec. 16 through attorney Charles Schmidt of Brandon & Schmidt in Carbondale.

The third-party defendant alleges Ameren failed to install the gas pipeline with appropriate cover, failed to minor the gas pipeline for appropriate depth location, failed to monitor the location and integrity of the gas pipeline, failed to provide notification of the actual location and depth of the gas pipeline, failed to ensure proper marking and re-marking of the actual location of the gas pipeline and failed to monitor the gas pipeline during construction and excavation of the “Villas of Nottingham” subdivision construction project.

Behme filed a motion to compel on Dec. 22 through Belleville attorney Thomas Keefe.

The plaintiff filed her first interrogatories and requests for production on Nov. 9, seeking “information related to Ameren’s own locating and marking programs for gas pipeline facilities as well as information related to Ameren’s relationship with third-party locating and marking companies.”

Ameren objected to the request on Dec. 3, arguing that “those discovery requests – to the extent they seek information regarding Ameren’s own internal locating policies/procedures/programs, as opposed to information regarding Ameren’s involvement with third party locators – are irrelevant.”

However, Behme argues that Ameren’s internal locating and marking policies and procedures could reasonably lead to the discovery of evidence that “Ameren failed to ensure proper marking and re-marking of the gas pipeline location.”

Ameren filed a memorandum in opposition to plaintiff’s motion to compel on Dec. 30 through attorneys Stephen Wigginton, Karen Baudendistel and Tod Stephens of Armstrong Teasdale in St. Louis.

The defendant argues that Behme seeks documents beyond the scope of the Illinois Underground Utility Facilities Damage Prevention Act and the Illinois State-Wide One-Call Notice System, making them irrelevant.
Ameren further alleges that the plaintiff’s requests “are so broad that they also seek documents created by AIC’s counsel and claims representatives in investigating the occurrence, preparing a defense to the lawsuit, and gathering information and documents responsive to the parties’ written discovery.”

“AIC has no obligation to create a privilege log of such activities and documents in this case. AIC requests this court to sustain its objections to these requests. To the extent AIC withholds any document created by a non-attorney or claims representative based on attorney-client privilege or work product doctrine, AIC will create a privilege log of such documents,” the memorandum continues.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 16-L-324

--- Article Removed ---

January 24, 2017, 4:20 pm

≫ Next: Judge Kievlan expected to return to work Feb. 1

≪ Previous: Construction company alleges Ameren was negligent in wrongful death suit

$

0

0

***
***
*** RSSing Note: Article removed by member request. ***
***

Judge Kievlan expected to return to work Feb. 1

January 24, 2017, 6:32 pm

≫ Next: Legal malpractice suit seeks attorney fee assessment and cost to defend protracted battle

≪ Previous: --- Article Removed ---

$

0

0

St. Clair County Associate Judge Patricia Kievlan is expected to return to work next week after spending roughly one month out sick.

Chief Judge Andrew Gleeson said Tuesday that he anticipates Kievlan to return Feb. 1. So far, she has been out for about three weeks, he said.

Kievlan presides over the family docket. Gleeson said the remaining associate and circuit judges have helped cover the docket as needed.

Kievlan was appointed associate judge in May 2013 and was retained in 2015.

Her current term of office began July 1, 2015, and will run until June 30, 2019.

Just before she was retained, Kievlan earned a 91.60 rating in the “meets requirements of office” category in the 2015 judicial evaluation poll conducted by the Illinois State Bar Association.

Prior to her appointment to the bench, Kievlan worked as an attorney with Pessin, Baird and Wells in Belleville.

She received her undergraduate degree in 1979 from the University of Kansas in Lawrence, Kan. She received her M.S.W. in 1980 and her juris doctor in 1995 from St. Louis University in St. Louis.

Legal malpractice suit seeks attorney fee assessment and cost to defend protracted battle

January 25, 2017, 7:47 am

≫ Next: The Illinois state senator who pledged not to raise income taxes

≪ Previous: Judge Kievlan expected to return to work Feb. 1

$

0

0

O'Fallon attorney Amanda Kelton Bradley Verett, suspended for 90 days in 2008 for her handling of a family law matter, is being sued for allegedly putting her client "in an extemely worse position legally and financially" than before she represented him.

Christopher Nolan filed a complaint on Jan. 17 in Madison County Circuit Court against Verett, alleging she deviated from the standard of care of a reasonable attorney by filing and obtaining ex parte relief against his ex-wife and a Missouri hospital despite knowing she was not entitled to do so.

Attorney Michael E. Reid also is named as co-defendant.

The Illinois Supreme Court suspended Verett in October 2008 on the recommendation of the state's Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission (ARDC) which charged her with making a false statement in a Missouri court and engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.

Verett was hired in 2007 to represent Christopher Nolan in an on-going dissolution case from former wife Tanna Nolan. In the divorce, a Madison County court had enjoined Christopher Nolan from contacting his son's doctors unless it was an emergency.

After the order was issued, Tanna Nolan scheduled a tonsillectomy for her son at Children's Hospital in St. Louis.

Several days prior to the surgery, Verett, in Madison County, filed a motion to stop the surgery from taking place. The motion was denied.

Verett then filed a petition for damages in St. Louis City Circuit Court against the son's medical providers. She also filed an injunction to stop the surgery.

According to the ARDC, at a hearing before St. Louis Circuit Judge John Garvey, Verett failed to tell the judge that she had just had a hearing in Illinois on the same matter.

Garvey subsequently enjoined the surgery, appointed a guardian ad litem for the minor, and ordered the mother to be added as a party.

Verett later withdrew her petition after the mother filed a motion to dismiss.

Garvey held a hearing and apologized to the lawyers for Children's Hospital and the mother telling them that had he known that the issue was taken care of in Madison County he would have immediately denied Verett's request.

At the hearing before the ARDC, Garvey testified that once he learned that the issue was disposed of in Madison County he was "mad" and felt like he "had just been lied to in court" by Verett.

Verett had testified before the ARDC that she did not lie to Judge Garvey but said she later realized that he "did not understand what the facts were in Madison County," and that she did not explain matters to Judge Garvey "clear enough to convey the appropriate information," and that it was her responsibility to do so.

Nolan's civil suit against Verett seeks in excess of $50,000 in damages. He claims that he was assessed $25,000 in attorney's fees as a result of Verett's alleged breach of contract and another $25,000 in fees in defending the assessment of attorney's fees.

He claims the statute of limitations did not begin to run until Oct. 21, 2016, when a motion he filed on Aug. 29, 2013 to reconsider the assessment of attorney's fees was denied.

Nolan claims Verett charged him $18,569.03 for services which not only provided no benefit, but also which put him in a worse position.

He is represented by attorney and former Madison County associate judge Thomas Hildebrand of Granite City, whose license to practice law was reinstated last September following a 10-year suspension.

In 2007, Verett sued Pizza Hut and Troy police officer Clarence Jackson claiming she suffered a shoulder injury because Pizza Hut negligently owned a faulty door that Jackson pulled one way while he entered the restaurant and she pulled the other way while exiting.

Her attorney Thomas Maag litigated the case in Madison County for two years before Circuit Judge Dennis Ruth dismissed it in 2009. The Fifth District Appellate Court affirmed Ruth in 2011.