Quantcast
Channel: Madison - St. Clair Record
Viewing all 22034 articles
Browse latest View live

Task force finds problem of rising court costs

$
0
0

A new report shows that court costs have escalated across the state, creating a burden on residents that use the systems.

The Illinois Statutory Court Fee Task Force identified key areas where problems exist: It cited that through assessment changes, an increased share of the cost of court administration is being passed on to the participants of the court proceedings and the cost of court fees and fines is outpacing inflation. It also notes that there are excessive variations across Illinois in the amount of the assessments for the same type of cases and that these increased costs have a severe impact on low- and moderate-income residents.

A spokesperson for the Madison County court system said that court fees are not rising locally. 

“Currently in Madison County there aren’t any additional fees that are going up,” Dina R. Burch, chief deputy at the Madison County Circuit Clerk, told the Record. “Occasionally the Supreme Court or state legislature will institute fees that we are required by law to add on to our court fees.”

In Madison County, Burch did say that fees assessed to users of the system most often pertain to criminal or traffic cases, which may explain the finding of the task force that fees target low- and moderate-income Illinois residents and create additional financial burden for them, as this demographic is most affected by these type of cases.

“Recently, we haven’t had any additional fees and it just really varies on what type of fee it is,” said Burch. “Often times it will pertain to a traffic or criminal case whether the court costs are set at a certain amount.”

Another factor of court costs is that there is no benchmark set, creating varying fines and fees across the state, depending on what county a defendant is in.

“If there is an increase it impacts all of the court users,” said Burch. “Anyone that is using the court system, whether it be a civil case or traffic case or criminal case.”

Regarding a fine such as a DUI, Burch said: “The amount distributed to costs depends on the total fines and costs ordered by the judge.” She did say that it does vary by county.

The task force has made several recommendations to the state on how to handle the situation of rising court costs with points such as recommending the General Assembly enact a schedule for courts assessment to promote affordability and transparency and that the General Assembly should authorize a uniform fees and fines schedule for criminal and traffic scale that is consistent throughout the state.

Daughter blames multiple health care entities for father's death

$
0
0

EDWARDSVILLE — A Madison County woman is suing multiple health care defendants, alleging their negligence caused the wrongful death of her father.

Peggy McKinnon, as executor of the estate of Dorse McKinnon, deceased filed a lawsuit July 12 in Madison County Circuit Court against Stearns Nursing and RehabilitationCenter LLC, Aurora Cares LLC, doing business as Tara Cares, Stearns Company LLC, Brent Hoffman, Jerry Nelson and Arthur Crowl, alleging violation of the Illinois Nursing Home Care Act.

According to the complaint, on July 13, 2014, Dorse McKinnon, who suffered from Alzheimer's disease and was a resident at defendants' facility at 3900 Stearns Ave., Granite City, was caused to fall by Crowl, resulting ultimately in McKinnon's death July 23, 2014. 

The plaintiff alleges the defendants failed to provide a safe environment, failed to provide proper personal care for their residents, failed to provide adequate supervision and failed to adequately monitor their residents.

Peggy McKinnon seeks a trial by jury, judgment of more than $50,000, attorney fees and legal costs, plus all other appropriate relief. She is represented by attorney Shaun M. Lieser of Lieser Law Firm LLC in St. Louis.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 16-L-985

Study indicates state judges show partisanship; pressures go away during last term of office, report says

$
0
0

WASHINGTON  – A group of independent researchers have published a study that looks at the relationship between state judges and partisan decisions and concluded that judges are systematically biased.

The researchers at Emory Law School published their findings in study called Partisan Justice, which examines the pressures states judges undergo from fundraising to aggressive politics and how these pressures influence their judgement to align with their party when making decisions.

“The only judge most people are ever going to see is a state court judge,” David Lyle, director of State Court Projects at the American Constitution Society told the Record. “The federal courts handle very few cases. The Supreme Court handles only 80 cases a year, whereas the state courts handle 90 percent of the nation’s judicial business. That’s about 90 million cases a year and that deals with everything that we might consider small matters, but they can have a huge impact on a person’s life.”

The study looked at data over a 10-year period, coming to the conclusion that state judges are systematically biased because of the pressures put on them by a need to generate campaign finances, re-election influences and the need to favor their party’s interest.

The study found evidence that partisanship occurs in state judges' decisions, beyond election cases. Whether this influence occurs consciously or unconsciously, the study says judges are also likely to make biased decisions in favor of their party in other cases.

“Almost all state court judges are under some kind of political scrutiny and political review,” Lyle said. “Partisan politics and campaign money have come in to the political system through which judges are selected and to keep their job. That puts political pressure on judges and really what it comes down to is there’s enormous pressure on judges to be part of a political team.

"They have to have the support of a party to keep their jobs. In many cases they have to raise a lot of money to keep their jobs. You can’t really do that successfully if you’re going to be this independent figure that is constantly bucking the party. You’re under a lot of pressure to be a part of the team.”

Although the study indicating that judges typically favor litigants from their own party, it is partisan bias that can be bad for the people that use the legal system.

“A system where judges are under partisan pressure is bad for people,” Lyle said. “Fair and impartial courts are an indispensable part of American democracy. If the courts lose their impartiality it really damages our democracy."

Although these pressures can affect a judge’s decisions, the study does indicate these pressures disappear during a state judges' last term in office as they are no longer required to raise money, campaign, run for election or remain loyal to their party.

“In the last term, all of those incentives and pressures go away,” Lyle said. “For that last term the judge is set. He or she has the job. No one’s going to take it away from them. They don’t have to worry about raising money anymore. They don’t have to worry about being part of a political coalition that has to turnout voters on Election Day. They can just take a deep breath and relax and do their job.

“Our goal should be to create a system where judges can do that throughout their career, rather than only at the very end of their career.”

Consumer accuses barbecue sauce manufacture of false advertising

$
0
0

BELLEVILLE — A Randolph County man is suing a barbecue sauce manufacturer, alleging it falsely advertises that its ingredients are all natural.

Larry Weigand filed a class action lawsuit, individually and on behalf of all other similarly-situated citizens of Illinois June 15 in St. Clair County Circuit Court against One World Foods, Inc. doing business as Stubb's Legendary Bar-B-Q, alleging false, deceptive, unfair and misleading merchandising practices, unjust enrichment and violation of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.

According to the complaint, Weigand has been deceived into believing the defendant's soy, garlic and pepper all natural marinade is all natural and it does not contain any harmful artificial synthetic ingredients. However, the suit says, the defendant manufactured, marketed, distributed and sold the product that is not all natural.

The suit alleges the product actually contains synthetic ingredients such as citric acid and xanthan gum, and that Stubb's took advantage of a growing market by labeling the product as all natural.

Weigand seeks a trial by jury, certification this case is a class action, compensatory damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, attorney fees and legal costs and such relief as is just and proper. He is represented by attorneys Matthew H Armstrong of Armstrong Law Firm LLC in St. Louis, David C. Nelson of Nelson & Nelson, Attorneys at Law PC in Belleville, and Stuart L. Cochran of Cochran Law PLLC in Dallas.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 16-L-316

O'Fallon, Troy registered voter signatures sought for property tax freeze petition

$
0
0

A group interested in saving taxpayers money is looking for at least 1,250 registered voters in O’Fallon and Troy willing to sign a petition supporting property tax freeze, a spokesman for the group said during a recent interview.

"That may not sound like a lot of signatures but it's no small feat," said Americans for Prosperity Foundation Illinois deputy state director Andrew E. Nelms. 

The pressure also is high because Americans for Prosperity Illinois has a fast-approaching Aug. 8 deadline to get enough signatures turned in to election officials in time to get the nonbinding advisory referendum on the November ballot.

This petition is far from the first time the foundation has pushed for a property tax freeze. During the most recent legislative session, the foundation strongly supported a property tax bill that failed to gain traction.

A property tax cut referendum will be on the ballot in Madison County in November following a petition drive earlier this year headed by Madison County Treasurer Kurt Prenzler.

Nelms said the response to the petition drive has been positive.

"People are tired of their property taxes continuing to go up, especially when their homes are going down in value," he said. 

However, it's more than tax fatigue, people also are frustrated, Nelms said.

"People are frustrated," he said. "They've had to make cuts in their homes and their lives but they don't see government making cuts."

Although this petition for an advisory referendum is only for O’Fallon and Troy voters, Americans for Prosperity Foundation Illinois supports a property tax freeze throughout the state.

This is only part of our overall effort to freeze property taxes," Nelms said. "Anyone outside of these communities who are interested in a property tax freeze, we're going to be interested in talking to them."

Volunteers have been busy getting the word out about the O’Fallon and Troy petition while progress is being reported on Twitter #FreedomInAction.

Judges – and voters -- have power to stop lawsuit abuse

$
0
0

The yearlong budget battle in Springfield ended last month with a truce, as legislative leaders and Governor Rauner agreed to a six-month stopgap budget. Left on the table, unfortunately, are all of the governor’s suggested reforms, including lawsuit reform.

That is a shame, because the continuing failure of our legislators to pass common sense lawsuit reforms is costing Illinois badly-needed jobs.

For far too long, Illinois has been a magnet for personal injury lawyers and plaintiffs from all over the country who clog our courts with junk lawsuits that have nothing to do with Illinois, all in the hopes of striking it rich playing our state’s plaintiff-friendly lawsuit lottery.

According to the recently released 2015 Lawsuit Climate Survey, conducted by Harris Poll, Illinois ranks near the bottom of the nation in terms of its lawsuit environment – 48th worst of the 50 states. More than 75 percent of the business leaders surveyed by Harris Poll for this report said lawsuit climate is a “significant factor” in determining where to expand and grow.

Companies look to locate or expand their businesses where the legal system is fair. We should not be surprised that Illinois is losing employers to states like Wisconsin that have passed lawsuit reforms in recent years to make their civil justice systems more fair.

Voters will have an opportunity this fall to weigh in on our legislators’ continuing failure to pass lawsuit reforms that will restore fairness to our courts. But there will be individuals on the ballot this November who have even more power than legislators to stop personal injury lawyers from abusing our courts.

Judges have the power to sanction personal injury lawyers who game the system and file frivolous lawsuits in Illinois courts that have no real connection to Illinois. But in many cases, judges receive the vast majority of their campaign contributions from these same personal injury lawyers, who have essentially turned Illinois courts into their own personal – and profitable – playgrounds.

Judges who create a more balanced litigation climate can help reduce lawsuits and create jobs. That is why it is so important to vote in the upcoming judicial elections this November. It is also important to know which judges and judicial candidates are taking the majority of their campaign contributions from personal injury lawyers.

Judicial races often do not enjoy the same level of interest and scrutiny as other races, but the outcomes of these races have as much if not more impact on our daily lives. Who is serving on the bench matters. Electing good judges who apply doctrines of common sense and fairness will make Illinois less of a magnet for lawsuits, and in turn, much more of a magnet for jobs.

Illinois Lawsuit Abuse Watch (I-LAW) is a grassroots watchdog group of concerned citizens, community leaders and small business people dedicated to educating the public about the widespread costs of lawsuit abuse. I-LAW has more than 20,000 supporters throughout Illinois. Anyone interested in becoming a supporter of I-LAW or learning more about stopping lawsuit abuse in Illinois can visit www.ILLawsuitAbuseWatch.org.

Illinois diverts federal funds from teachers to TRS

$
0
0

Illinois’ most impoverished school districts have lost millions of dollars to a scheme intended to shore up the state’s monumentally underfunded teacher pension reserve.

And it’s about to get worse.

Unlike their counterparts in other states, Illinois school districts pay a steep premium to the Teachers’ Retirement System, or TRS, if they use Title I federal money to hire teachers.

Districts are assessed 36.06 percent of salaries paid with federal Title I funds, and that is set to increase to 38.54 percent for the 2016-2017 school year. By comparison, the rate for a district not using Title I money is and will remain 0.58 percent.

So a district using Title I money to hire a teacher at $50,000 a year would fork over $19,270 to TRS, but the tab for a district paying a teacher the same salary out of state and local funds would be $290.

To paraphrase U.S. Rep. Robert Dold, taxpayers from across the nation are pouring vast sums into Illinois’ teacher pension-debt quagmire. And the biggest losers? The very ones the Title I money is intended to aid – low-income students.

“There’s no question we need to get the fiscal house in order in the state of Illinois,” said Dold, R-Ill. “But to try to do this by taking federal dollars meant to shore up some of the neediest school districts is the wrong approach.”

According to Dold’s website, Illinois collects about $74.5 million a year through this practice and puts about $59 million toward paying down past years’ multibillion-dollar pension debt.

In 2015, Dold sponsored an education bill amendment to halt the practice. The measure passed unanimously in the House, but was taken out of the Senate’s version of the bill.

“We wrote [the amendment] in essence to take care of the situation in Illinois,” Dold said. “There is no other state in the country that I know of that does this.”

Dold sponsored a separate bill that would achieve the same result; it rests in the U.S. House Education and the Workforce Committee.

Superintendent Ehren Jarrett of Rockford School District 205 is among those wishing Dold and other like-minded lawmakers success. District 205 operates 47 schools serving about 29,000 students. Roughly 80 percent are low-income.

“It’s a huge impact on our district,” Jarrett said. “Over $1.6 million last year went toward the 36 percent rate that we had to pay … it’s an additional 20 full-time staff members we could hire with our own Title I dollars were it not for the penalty.”

The penalty does not apply when districts use Title I money for educational materials, equipment or noncertified staff. However, Jarrett and others said forcing districts to shuttle the federal dollars to areas of lesser need is counterproductive. And for the districts struggling the most – where fewer local dollars are available for salaries – the penalty strikes hardest.

“Like every other district, we try to minimize the effect” by spending as much local money as possible toward teacher salaries, Jarrett said. “But frankly, so much of what our students need is more time with certified staff.”

That message is not lost on state Rep. Joe Sosnowski, R-Rockford, who referred to Illinois’ practice as theft.

“We’re really robbing those federal funds in order to shore up our pension system,” he said.

“Wide bipartisan support exists to cap the state tax rate of Title I money to represent the employer’s normal cost, which would exclude the unfunded liability that the state created,” Sosnowski said.

However, a bill passed in the Senate this spring has yet to be assigned to a House committee.

“That falls in the speaker’s lap,” Sosnowski said, referring to House Speaker Michael Madigan, D-Chicago. “I’m not sure of the rationale for not assigning it, but we weren’t able to get any movement.”

Even those in charge of TRS see the present situation as wrong-headed.

“The TRS board voted in 2013 to reduce the amount of money school districts needed to pay to cover the retirement costs of teachers hired with federal funds,” TRS spokesman David Urbanek said in an email. “The board at the time was unanimous that school districts should only have to pay for the actual cost of teachers’ pensions and no more.”

The General Assembly overrode the TRS board’s unanimous decision, Urbanek said. Furthermore, it removed the board’s power to set the rate.

“School districts should not have to use limited federal funds meant for teaching to pay for a problem that they did not create, namely an unfunded liability built up by decades of inadequate funding by state government,” Urbanek said.

Joe Bascio, Springfield District 186 business manager, said his district sent hundreds of thousands of its 2015-2016 Title I dollars to TRS.

The district has 35 buildings and enrolls 15,062 students, of which 8,836, or 58.7 percent, are low-income, he said. The district’s Title I budget for the 2015-2016 school year was $6.65 million. Officials spent $2.1 million of it on teacher salaries. That meant the district paid $755,000 toward the TRS requirement.

“That $755,000 could be going to student needs,” Bascio said. “It is a big issue.”

With the rate rising ever closer to 40 percent, District 186 is budgeting differently for the coming school year to avoid the penalty, he added. Title I money will be allocated primarily toward needs other than teacher salaries, which will avoid having to pay about $900,000 in TRS penalties.

In Quincy School District 172, about 64 percent of the district’s 6,500 students qualify for the free or reduced-price lunch program, a harbinger for Title I dollars.

“Do I like paying 38 percent into TRS? No,” said Quincy Business Manager Joel Murphy. “It forces us to make some judgments as to what salaries we wind up paying out of Title I dollars and what we don’t because we’re trying to maximize the dollars that we have.”

Murphy said he is concerned, however, about the ramifications of eliminating the practice. “There are a lot of things happening in Springfield,” he said. “They’re talking about shifting some of those [pension-debt obligation] costs back to us. … I’m not sure how that benefits students, either.”

Dold noted that the $700,000 that Waukegan schools in his 10th Congressional District paid to TRS made the difference between having and not having all-day kindergarten.

“That’s a big deal in a community where you have single parents who are working or both parents working,” he said. “We’ll continue to highlight this issue and continue to work on it.”

Motorist alleges another driver's negligence caused crash

$
0
0

EDWARDSVILLE — A Madison County woman is suing a motorist, alleging the defendant's negligence led to a car crash that injured the plaintiff. 

Jodi S. Dwyer filed a complaint on July 6 in Madison County Circuit Court against Nellie A. Smith, alleging negligence. 

According to the complaint, on July 16, 2014, Dwyer was driving northbound while exiting the Fast Track convenience store in East Alton. At the same time, the suit says, Smith backed her vehicle out of a parking space and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle.

The lawsuit says the collision caused Dwyer to sustain injuries to her body and limbs, resulting in pain and suffering, emotional distress and medical expenses. The plaintiff alleges Smith failed to keep proper lookout, proceeded at a speed greater than reasonable and carelessly backed her vehicle.

Dwyer seeks a trial by jury, judgment of more than $50,000, plus costs of suit. She is represented by attorneys Gregory D. Abel and Julie A. Themer of Hausmann McNally SC in Decatur.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 16-L-953


Motorist alleges another driver caused crash

$
0
0

EDWARDSVILLE — A Madison County car owner is suing another motorist, alleging her negligence caused a car crash that injured the plaintiff.

Neal Hornbostel filed a lawsuit June 16 in Madison County Circuit Court against Samantha Hedlund, alleging negligence in that insufficient measures were taken to prevent injuries.

According to the complaint, on June 16, 2015, when Hornbostel was driving southbound on state Route 4 in Madison County, he was run into by a car driven by Hedlund. The suit says he sustained injuries on his head, body and right knee, soft tissue damage to his shoulder and was made sick, lame, disoriented and disabled. 

The plaintiff alleges Hedlund failed to keep proper lookout for other vehicles, operated her vehicle at an excessive rate of speed and failed to apply her brakes in a timely fashion.

Hornbostel seeks a trial by jury and judgment of more than $50,000. He is represented by attorneys Thomas C. Rich, Kristina D. Cooksey and Mitchelle M. Rich of Fairview Heights.

Madison County Circuit Court Case number 16L1002

Motorist alleges another driver's negligence caused crash

$
0
0

EDWARDSVILLE — A Madison County man is suing two Illinois residents, alleging their negligence led to a car crash that injured the plaintiff.

Jean Bedel Bonne-Annee filed a lawsuit July 11 in Madison County Circuit Court against Mark E. Worker and Zachary England, alleging negligence in failing to maintain proper control of their vehicle.

According to the complaint, on May 28, 2015, Bonne-Annee was driving west on Interstate Highway 70 near its intersection with state Route 43 and was stopped in the left lane of traffic in the Marine Township. The suit says Worker, an employee of England's, negligently operated their vehicle and collided with the rear of the plaintiff's vehicle.

The collision, the lawsuit states, caused Bonne-Annee to to sustain injuries that resulted in great pain and discomfort, physical impairment and medical expenses. The plaintiff alleges Worker failed to keep proper lookout, failed to sound his horn, failed to slow down and stop and failed to maintain a proper speed.

Bonne-Annee seeks a trial by jury, judgment of more than $50,000, plus costs of suit. He is represented by attorney Mark A. Bazzanella of Law Offices of Mark A. Bazzanella in Chicago.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 16-L-981

Insurer raises questions about unclaimed benefits bill; Hoping for Rauner's amendatory veto

$
0
0

SPRINGFIELD — In a legislative session noted as one of inaction until the brink of a new fiscal year, one bill Illinois lawmakers did manage to pass was a measure that requires life insurance companies to make an effort to track down beneficiaries of unclaimed policies, contracts and accounts when they know the policyholder has died.

The bill called the Unclaimed Life Insurance Benefits Act, passed both houses and was sent to Gov. Bruce Rauner on June 27 where it remains unsigned. 

The law would require insurance companies to make “good faith efforts” to locate beneficiaries of unclaimed life insurance policies, annuity contracts, and retained asset accounts. It would require companies to start comparing their records to the U.S. Social Security Administration's Death Master File (DMF) — an updated database of death certificates that would show whether the policyholder has died. If the company can’t find the beneficiary, the law would require it to give up the proceeds as unclaimed property, which are handled by the Illinois State Treasurer.

Stakeholders lobbied both sides of the issue, which has been raised in several states over the last few years. Many in the industry are open to the changes — which garnered unanimous support from lawmakers — but it constitutes a major shift in how these insurance policies are handled, a Kemper Corp. spokesperson told the Record.

“Keep in mind that virtually all insurance products have always been marketed and regulated with the understanding that the customer would come forward to initiate the claim process,” the spokesperson said. “Now, the life insurance industry is being told that it’s incumbent on the companies to go out and find out if a claim might be payable. That’s a massive change to absorb.”

While calling for the governor to sign the bill, Illinois Treasurer Michael Frerich and other proponents pointed to companies who use the Death Master File to stop annuity payments but not to determine if life insurance benefits are owed.

“It’s a disappointing fact, but some life insurance companies admit that they avoid paying death benefits to increase their profit margins,” Frerichs said in a statement asking Rauner to sign the bill. “Governor Rauner has an opportunity to sign into law a measure to ensure Illinois residents are not victimized by certain life insurance companies.”

But there’s also more under the surface of the issue — and there may be more in it for the state of Illinois than Frerichs says.

In 2015, three Kemper Corp. insurance companies sued Frerichs and private auditing company Verus Financial, claiming they were requiring insurers to pay policy benefits to beneficiaries or to the state if the policyholder appeared on the DMF, rather than paying benefits when they are due under policy contracts.

According to the suit, Frerichs’ authorized unclaimed property examinations of about 40 insurers that issue life insurance policies in the state, and in many of these audits he hired Verus to do the audit. Verus gets paid for results, either as a percentage or a flat fee.

Litigation is ongoing in California and Illinois.

The law that passed in Illinois holds that if an insurer can’t locate a beneficiary, the benefits get handed over to the treasurer as unclaimed property. There are steps in place to continue the effort to reunite people with the money their loved one intended them to have. But, after a while, if it isn’t collected, the state can keep it.

Kemper Corp. is critical of states’ efforts to pass this law because of potential conflicts of interest.

“These states may claim they are just protecting consumers, but their actions expose that they are more interested in getting their hands on monies and properties that citizens may not be monitoring. States generally do a poor job of returning assets to the rightful owner,” the Kemper spokesperson said. “Additionally, state officials have not disclosed that the other big winners in this area are the audit firms that take a huge piece of the assets they claim to have ‘found.’”

The lawsuit with Verus revealed that the audit firm has earned more than $51 million from its work in California and Illinois, the spokesperson said. “States and these auditing firms have a questionable relationship that needs further examination, as does the state treasurers’ conflict of interest.”

Verus was unavailable to answer questions for this article, but public records show it hired a handful of lobbyists during this year’s legislative session.

Kemper, which also lobbied state lawmakers, calls the bill a “one-size-fits-all approach” that doesn’t suit companies that haven’t acted inappropriately with consumers.

“Given the state treasurer’s rhetoric on the topic, we believe lawmakers supported the Illinois bill because they were not fully informed on all the facts,” the spokesperson said. “When they only heard about the 24 companies that behaved inappropriately and settled — out of the hundreds of life insurers that serve consumers honorably — they approved the one-size-fits-all bill.”

Legislatures across the country are considering enacting laws that fall under a new national standard supported by the insurance industry. The American Council of Life Insurers has advocated strongly for the standard.

So far, 21 states have enacted legislation, John Gerni, Regional Vice President of State Relations at the American Council of Life Insurers, told the Record. He said the Illinois bill includes provisions ACLI strongly supports, but it isn’t based on the national standard ACLI drafted with other stakeholders.

The insurance industry is starting to recognize ways that life insurance differs from other kinds of insurance, Steven Weisbart, senior vice president and chief economist for the Insurance Information Institute, told the Record. If a person gets into a collision with a car, he or she informs the insurance agency. It’s meant to work the same with life insurance — the insurer waits for a beneficiary to file a claim.

But people live longer now. They could forget they purchased a plan decades ago; the company could have merged with another or changed its name. Either way the timeframe makes it more likely that the beneficiaries don’t know the plan exists or where to file a claim.

“There’s widespread agreement that companies should check with records of death,” Weisbart said.

Some states want this new rule to affect past policies, as well. Industry opinions differ over whether that’s fair, Weisbart said. 

This is one of Kemper’s issues with the Illinois law.

“We suggested that with respect to companies that were already using the DMF on part of their business, mainly annuities, that such companies should have to use the DMF on all of their policies,” the spokesperson said. “For companies like us, however, that had not used the DMF, we felt a reasonable solution was to require DMF use on all policies sold going forward.”

The spokesperson said Kemper hopes Rauner either vetoes the bill and pushes the legislature to revisit the issue or uses his amendatory veto powers to “fix the flaws in the current bill.”


Madison County Democrat party bosses' hypocrisy on full display

$
0
0
To the Editor:

The hypocrisy and blatant double-standard of Democrat party bosses was on full display recently. They applied a liberal standard to a Democrat challenge to petitions filed by voters to put a tax cut referendum on the ballot, but a very strict standard to a challenge filed by Republicans to another set of petitions. At least their hypocrisy was public, obvious and open. That’s the best one can say about it.

In challenging a Republican tax cut referendum, objections were filed by Democrat party bosses. The Electoral Board immediately went to a full binder check, a process by which the County Clerk’s staff scrutinizes each and every signature on each and every petition. The Electoral Board did this full binder check despite the fact that only a fraction of the signatures were actually objected to. Fortunately for democracy, the Democrat State’s Attorney Tom Gibbons and the Democrat Circuit Clerk (coincidentally also the Democrat Party Chairman) Mark Von Nida recused themselves and an Electoral Board was appointed. This Electoral Board had a conscience- one Republican.

Despite accepting all of the challenges to signatures from the binder check and all of the challenges from the objections filed by the Democrat objectors, the objection to the petitions was denied. But only after Republicans had to defend against both the binder check done by the Democrat County Clerk and the objections filed by the objectors. But what is good for the Republican goose is apparently not good for the Democrat gander.

A week later, Republicans filed an objection to a second set of nominating petitions filed against Republican County Board candidate Don Moore of Troy. This time party bosses Gibbons and Von Nida decided to stay on the Electoral Board. Along with Democrat County Clerk Debbie Mendoza, the second Electoral Board was comprised of three Democrats- and no conscience.

This second electoral Board also decided to conduct a full binder check. That check showed the petitions were insufficient. The Board asked their Democrat attorney if the binder check should be accepted. He agreed. But Democrat hypocrisy was lurking like a political tumor.

The second conscienceless Electoral Board ruled that the binder check should be limited to the objections filed by Republicans. This was the exact opposite ruling made in the case of Democrat objection just two weeks previously. The second Board overruled the Republican objections by applying the exact opposite logic applied to the tax cut referendum petitions.

What is even more amazing is that Democrat Mendoza was on both Boards. She voted to apply a very liberal standard to a Democrat challenge and then voted to apply an opposite and very stringent standard to a Republican challenge. Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds as far as Democrat party bosses are concerned.

What is on full, unashamed public display here is the hypocrisy and blatant double standard of Democrat “ethics” in Madison County.

Democrat party bosses believe it is a crime to pay someone else’s taxes but it is OK to purchase tens of millions of dollars of long range bonds outside of legal guidelines. It is OK to have the County purchasing agent, appointed by Democrat Alan Dunstan, to accept contributions to Dunstan’s campaign from County vendors, but it is heresy for defrauded taxpayers to try to recover the millions stolen from them by Democrat Fred Bathon and his cronies.

Democrat party bosses' hypocrisy is unashamed and boundless.

Voters can do something about this hypocrisy in November.

Don Weber
Edwardsville

Wrongful death suit filed after accident between farm tractor, tractor-trailer

$
0
0

EAST ST. LOUIS – A Nashville widow has filed a wrongful death suit against a tractor-trailer driver and his employer after an accident in Perry County resulted in her husband's death.

Jill E. Bowers, executor of the estate of Alan R. Bowers Sr., deceased filed a complaint on July 15 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois against Samuel R. Latham and T. F. Acquisition LLC, doing business as Transfreight, alleging wrongful death.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that on July 24, 2015, plaintiff’s decedent was operating a 2004 John Deere tractor traveling eastbound on state Route 154 in Perry County while defendant Latham, who was operating a 2014 Freightliner truck, negligently struck decedent's tractor, resulting in the decedent's death. The plaintiff holds Latham and T. F. Acquisition LLC responsible because Latham allegedly failed to keep a proper lookout, failed to yield to other traffic properly on the roadway and drove faster than reasonable.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks judgment against the defendant for a fair and just award of more than $75,000 plus costs of this suit. She is represented by Jon E. Rosenstengel of Bonifield & Rosenstengel PC in Belleville.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois case number 3:16-cv-802

Madison passenger files suit against two motorists for alleged negligence

$
0
0

EDWARDSVILLE – A Madison woman has filed suit against two drivers after she alleges she was injured in an auto accident.

Constance Starnes filed a complaint on July 18 in the Madison County Circuit Court against the Malissa Phillips and Tammie Starnes alleging negligence.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that on Oct. 8, 2015, she was a passenger in the vehicle being driven by defendant Starnes when defendants got involved in a motor vehicle collision, causing her to sustain injuries that resulted in physical pain and suffering, disfigurement, disability and medical expenses. The suit states the incident took place on Sixth Street and Alton Avenue. The plaintiff holds Phillips and Starnes responsible because the defendants allegedly failed to yield right of way, failed to reduce speed, failed to keep proper lookout and failed to exercise reasonable care.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks judgment against defendants in an amount greater than $50,000 and for such further relief as the court deems just and proper. She is represented by Matthew P. Young of Kuehn, Beasley & Young PC in Belleville.

Madison County Circuit Court case number 16-L-1017

Pedestrian alleges injuries after being struck by driver

$
0
0

EDWARDSVILLE – A pedestrian has filed suit against a motorist over alleged injuries after he was struck walking in Alton.

Bobbie R. Highsmith III filed a complaint on July 15 in the Madison County Circuit Court against James E. Perry alleging negligence.

According to the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that on Oct. 31, 2015, he was pushing an inoperable motorized bike in a parking lane on Washington Avenue in Alton when the defendant left his lane of travel and struck the plaintiff. The plaintiff alleges he sustained injuries, but not limited to, his right hand that made him sick, sore, lame and disordered. The plaintiff holds Perry responsible because the defendant allegedly negligently and carelessly failed to reduce vehicle speed, lose control of the vehicle and disobeyed law of traffic.

The plaintiff requests a trial by jury and seeks judgment in his favor in an amount of more than $50,000. He is represented by Craig J. Jensen of MeyerJensen PC in Alton.

Madison County Circuit Court Case number 16L1010


Illinois Central seeks to transfer another injury claim out of St. Clair County

$
0
0

Lawyers for a railroad engineer who claims his former supervisor at Illinois Central harassed him to the point of suffering a heart attack want St. Clair County Circuit Judge Andrew Gleeson to deny a defense motion to transfer the case to Clinton County.

In a motion filed July 20, Charles Armbruster relied on a recent Fifth District decision in which the appellate court affirmed denial of transfer in a another St. Clair County case against Illinois Central Railroad. (Decker v. Illinois Central).

Armbruster and Michael Blotevogel of Maryville represent Eddie McCandrew, who alleges that after he returned to work following his heart attack, his supervisor’s harassment continued. As a result, he claims he was forced to resign.

Illinois Central, represented by Kurt Reitz of Thompson Coburn in Belleville, seeks to dismiss the suit, or in the alternative to transfer the case because the plaintiff's residence is in Breese in Clinton County, the alleged incidents did not occur in St. Clair County, the majority of medical treatment took place in Randolph or Jefferson counties and no fact witnesses are local.

"The defendant may not argue that the plaintiff's chosen forum in inconvenient to the plaintiff," Armbruster quoted from the Decker order.

The Fifth District also noted in the Decker ruling that, "Our supreme court has also recognized that forum shopping it not employed exclusively by the plaintiffs' bar, and that both plaintiff's counsel and defense counsel engage in tactical maneuvers to obtain a forum that will enable them to achieve the best result for their clients, while all other considerations of inconvenience are secondary."

Armbruster wrote that no single county enjoys a predominant connection to the litigation and that potential trial witnesses and other sources of proof are scattered among several counties, including McCandrew's chosen forum.

"...[I]t can hardly be stated that the balance of factors strongly favors transfer of this case to Clinton County," he wrote.

McCandrew seeks in excess of $50,000 in damages.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 15-L-582

Bi-State denies liability in bus passenger's injury suit

$
0
0

Bi-State Development Agency denies negligence in a lawsuit brought by a passenger who claims injuries when an unsecured wheelchair rolled into her when the Metro bus she was riding in was involved in an accident.

Represented by Matthew Champlin of HeplerBroom in Edwardsville, Bi-State says in its affirmative defense that the alleged injuries suffered by Nicole Johnson-Barnett were caused in whole or in part by her.

"Plaintiff's recovery should therefore be reduced in whole or in part," Champlin wrote.

In her suit filed in April, Johnson-Barnett alleges Bi-State was negligent by failing to keep a proper lookout, operating the bus in such a manner as to cause it to stop suddenly and allow a wheelchair to roll into her, driving at an excessive rate of speed, and failing to properly secure a wheelchair.

The plaintiff seeks judgment against the defendant in excess of $50,000 plus court costs. She is represented by Thomas C. Rich, Kristina D. Cooksey and Michelle M. Rich of Thomas C. Rich PC in Fairview Heights.

St. Clair County Associate Judge Randall Kelley presides.

A case management order signed July 20 set a trial date of Sept. 18, 2017.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 16-L-193

Seat manufacturer denies counter claims of driver involved in fatal accident

$
0
0

Magna Seating denies the counter claims of a driver being sued in St. Clair County over the death of Cheryl Schmeder last year.

According to the suit brought by surviving husband Larry Schmeder, the driver's seat back of a 1997 Chrysler Town & Country operated by Schmeder collapsed when it was rear-ended by a 2001 Chevrolet Silverado operated by co-defendant Gary Mathenia.

The wrongful death and negligent manufacturing suit claims that Schmeder's mini van lacked adequate bolts.

Magna Seating, represented by attorneys at HeplerBroom in Edwardsville and Shook Hardy and Bacon in Kansas City, Mo., responded last month to Mathenia's counter claims asserting that alleged damages were caused by a substantial modification to the seats.

"Any product designed, manufactured or sold by Magna Seating conformed in all respects to the state of the at in the indusgtry at the time of manufacture," wrote W. Jason Rankin of HeplerBroom.

Circuit Judge Vincent Lopinot presides.

A May 31 status conference was continued to Aug. 22.

Schmeder seeks a judgment in his favor for more than $75,000 plus attorneys’ fees and costs.

The plaintiff is represented by Thomas Q. Keefe Jr. of Keefe & Keefe in Belleville.

Mathenia is represented by Stephen Mudge of Edwardsville. 

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 15-L-438

House guest's suit over knife injury to the eye settled and dismissed

$
0
0

A personal injury lawsuit against an O’Fallon woman who stood accused of negligently handling knives and injuring a house guest has been settled.

St. Clair County Associate Judge Randall Kelley dismissed the case with prejudice with each side to bear their costs.

The case had been docketed for case management on July 18, but was continued to Oct. 4. 

Racheal Lea Brown had denied the allegations made against her by Chad Richter, who filed suit in May 2015.

Richter had alleged that Brown used one or more knives in such a manner that she should have known or anticipated that he would be likely to intervene. Richter claims he attempted to assist or rescue Brown when he suffered a severe eye injury.

Brown is represented by John P. Cunningham of Belleville.

Richter, represented by Mark Schuver of Belleville, sought damages in excess of $50,000.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 15-L-269

Gold tooth in Pillsbury biscuit case continued to October

$
0
0

A July 20 status conference in a lawsuit alleging a man discovered someone’s gold tooth when he bit into a Pillsbury baked biscuit has been continued to Oct. 5.

St. Clair County Associate Judge Randall Kelley presides in a case brought last year by Elmo Kane.

Kane claims he purchased a sealed can of Pillsbury Grands Biscuits Southern Style on Nov. 20, 2014, and that the container had not been previously opened, punctured or otherwise tampered with.

However, after he baked the biscuits and took a bite, he “bit into someone else’s gold tooth that was in the biscuit.” The plaintiff allegedly immediately placed the can and the tooth into a plastic bag.

Kane accuses the defendant of negligence for failing to adequately package the product and failing “to manufacture a product fit for human consumption,” the suit states.

Kane seeks a judgment of more than $50,000, plus attorney’s fees and costs.

He is represented by Matthew Young of Kuehn, Beasley & Young in Belleville.

Curtis R. Picou and Mary G. Sullivan of Crivello, Carlsoon, Picou & Andrekanic in Edwardsville and Jerry W. Blackwell, Corey L. Gordon and Mary S. Young of Minneapolis represent General Mills.

In March, Kelley issued a protective order with respect to confidential business information that “would adversely affect General Mills’ business” if made public.

St. Clair County Circuit Court case number 15-L-359
Viewing all 22034 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>